Re: Postgres 15 SELECT query doesn't use index under RLS
Alexander Okulovich <aokulovich@stiltsoft.com>
From: Alexander Okulovich <aokulovich@stiltsoft.com>
To: Tomek <tomekphotos@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-10-19T09:58:30Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hi Tomek, Unfortunately, I didn't dig into this. This request is recommended to provide when describing <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions#Statistics:_n_distinct,_MCV,_histogram> slow query issues, but looks like it relates to JOINs in the query, which we don't have. Kind regards, Alexander On 19.10.2023 09:43, Tomek wrote: > Hi Alexander! > Apart from the problem you are writing about I'd like to ask you to > explain how you interpret counted frac_MCV - for me it has no sense at > all to summarize most_common_freqs. > Please rethink it and explain what was the idea of such SUM ? I > understand that it can be some measure for ratio of NULL values but > only in some cases when n_distinct is small. > > regards > >> >> Statistics: n_distinct, MCV, histogram >> >> Useful to check statistics leading to bad join plan. SELECT >> (SELECT sum(x) FROM unnest(most_common_freqs) x) frac_MCV, >> tablename, attname, inherited, null_frac, n_distinct, >> array_length(most_common_vals,1) n_mcv, >> array_length(histogram_bounds,1) n_hist, correlation FROM >> pg_stats WHERE attname='...' AND tablename='...' ORDER BY 1 >> DESC; >> >> Returns 0 rows. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Alexander >>