Re: unlogged sequences

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-04-07T15:24:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 06.04.22 11:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We could also move forward with this patch independently of the other 
> one.  If we end up reverting the other one, then this one won't be very 
> useful but it won't really hurt anything and it would presumably become 
> useful eventually.  What we presumably don't want is that the sequence 
> replication patch gets repaired for PG15 and we didn't end up committing 
> this patch because of uncertainty.

I have received some encouragement off-list to go ahead with this, so 
it's been committed.




Commits

  1. Unlogged sequences

  2. Preparatory test cleanup