Re: incoorect restore_command
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Philipp Gramzow <phil@philphonic.de>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-02-24T11:15:59Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On 2021/02/24 16:52, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:24:17AM +0100, Philipp Gramzow wrote: >> I agree, using a proper extension would be more straightforward. I'm sure >> that's the reason why someone changed our archive_command. > > Okay, let's do so in the docs then. Others may have comments to > offer, so I'll first wait a bit before applying my suggestion from > upthread. I agree with this change. But I have one question; why do those commands use different archive directories? Isn't it better to use the same one? Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Commits
-
doc: Improve {archive,restore}_command for compressed logs
- 329784e11849 14.0 landed