Re: incoorect restore_command

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>

From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Philipp Gramzow <phil@philphonic.de>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-02-24T11:15:59Z
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2021/02/24 16:52, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:24:17AM +0100, Philipp Gramzow wrote:
>> I agree, using a proper extension would be more straightforward. I'm sure
>> that's the reason why someone changed our archive_command.
> 
> Okay, let's do so in the docs then.  Others may have comments to
> offer, so I'll first wait a bit before applying my suggestion from
> upthread.

I agree with this change.

But I have one question; why do those commands use different
archive directories? Isn't it better to use the same one?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



Commits

  1. doc: Improve {archive,restore}_command for compressed logs