Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
Attachments
- bugfix.diff (text/x-patch) patch
On 28.11.2024 22:28, Ranier Vilela wrote: > Em qui., 28 de nov. de 2024 às 16:03, Alena Rybakina > <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> escreveu: > > Hi! Thank you for the case. > > On 28.11.2024 21:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > > Hello Alexander, > > > > 21.11.2024 09:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >> I'm going to push this if no objections. > > > > Please look at the following query, which triggers an error after > > ae4569161: > > SET random_page_cost = 1; > > CREATE TABLE tbl(u UUID); > > CREATE INDEX idx ON tbl USING HASH (u); > > SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = > '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR > > u = '11111111111111111111111111111111'; > > > > ERROR: XX000: ScalarArrayOpExpr index qual found where not allowed > > LOCATION: ExecIndexBuildScanKeys, nodeIndexscan.c:1625 > > > > > I found out what the problem is index scan method was not > generated. We > need to check this during OR clauses for SAOP transformation. > > There is a patch to fix this problem. > > Hi. > Thanks for the quick fix. > > But I wonder if it is not possible to avoid all if the index is useless? > Maybe moving your fix to the beginning of the function? > > diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c > b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c > index d827fc9f4d..5ea0b27d01 100644 > --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c > +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c > @@ -3248,6 +3248,10 @@ match_orclause_to_indexcol(PlannerInfo *root, > Assert(IsA(orclause, BoolExpr)); > Assert(orclause->boolop == OR_EXPR); > > + /* Ignore index if it doesn't support index scans */ > + if(!index->amsearcharray) > + return NULL; > + Agree. I have updated the patch > /* > * Try to convert a list of OR-clauses to a single SAOP expression. Each > * OR entry must be in the form: (indexkey operator constant) or > (constant > > The test bug: > EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = > '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR u = > '11111111111111111111111111111111'; > QUERY PLAN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Aggregate (cost=12.46..12.47 rows=1 width=8) > -> Bitmap Heap Scan on tbl (cost=2.14..12.41 rows=18 width=0) > Recheck Cond: ((u = > '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) OR (u = > '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid)) > -> BitmapOr (cost=2.14..2.14 rows=18 width=0) > -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 > width=0) > Index Cond: (u = > '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) > -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 > width=0) > Index Cond: (u = > '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid) > (8 rows) > Thank you -- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional