Thread

  1. One regression failure with 7.4.1 on Debian 3.0r2

    awitney@sghms.ac.uk — 2003-12-23T20:24:57Z

    I have one regression failure on 7.4.1, which does not occur with 7.4
    
    adam@bugsdb$ more src/test/regress/regression.diffs
    *** ./expected/random.out       Thu Feb 13 05:24:04 2003
    --- ./results/random.out        Tue Dec 23 20:19:40 2003
    ***************
    *** 25,31 ****
        GROUP BY random HAVING count(random) > 1;
       random | count 
      --------+-------
    ! (0 rows)
      
      SELECT random FROM RANDOM_TBL
        WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120;
    --- 25,32 ----
        GROUP BY random HAVING count(random) > 1;
       random | count 
      --------+-------
    !     103 |     2
    ! (1 row)
      
      SELECT random FROM RANDOM_TBL
        WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120;
    
    
    
    adam@bugsdb$ uname -a
    Linux bugsdb 2.4.23 #1 SMP Tue Dec 23 12:29:42 GMT 2003 i686 unknown
    
    
    -- 
    This message has been scanned for viruses and
    dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
    believed to be clean.
    
    
    
  2. Re: One regression failure with 7.4.1 on Debian 3.0r2

    Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> — 2004-01-05T14:17:08Z

    Adam Witney <awitney@sghms.ac.uk> writes:
    > I have one regression failure on 7.4.1, which does not occur with 7.4
    >
    > adam@bugsdb$ more src/test/regress/regression.diffs
    > *** ./expected/random.out       Thu Feb 13 05:24:04 2003
    > --- ./results/random.out        Tue Dec 23 20:19:40 2003
    > ***************
    > *** 25,31 ****
    >     GROUP BY random HAVING count(random) > 1;
    >    random | count 
    >   --------+-------
    > ! (0 rows)
    >   
    >   SELECT random FROM RANDOM_TBL
    >     WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120;
    > --- 25,32 ----
    >     GROUP BY random HAVING count(random) > 1;
    >    random | count 
    >   --------+-------
    > !     103 |     2
    > ! (1 row)
    >   
    >   SELECT random FROM RANDOM_TBL
    >     WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120;
    
    Unless this happens consistently (i.e. if you run the regression tests
    20 times, this test fails more than once or twice), don't worry about
    it: the 'random' test is mildly non-deterministic.
    
    -Neil
    
    
    
  3. UNSUBSCRIBE

    Ben Clewett <b.clewett@roadrunner.uk.com> — 2004-01-05T17:15:06Z

    UNSUBSCRIBE
    
    
  4. UNSUBSCRIBE

    Steven Vajdic <svajdic@asc.corp.mot.com> — 2004-01-05T22:46:22Z

    UNSUBSCRIBE