Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4
Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Date: 2003-11-19T00:21:37Z
Lists: pgsql-general
scott.marlowe wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > >>On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:39:40PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >> >>>Supplanting PITR with Replication? If so, I don't think that's >> >>No, I think the idea is that if you're already using the replication >>system, you can get this for nothing along with it. Yes, it'll cost >>you in hardware. > > > No, it's more along the lines of "once the replication system is written, > it can be adapted to provide PITR (without the need for actual > replication) as a side effect. I think the opposit: Once the PITR is written it can be used for Replication as side effect. For example the Sybase Replication is implemented in this way. Regards Gaetano Mendola