Re: count(*) slow on large tables
Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: Dror Matalon <dror@zapatec.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-10-03T06:29:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Dror Matalon wrote: > I smell a religious war in the aii:-). > Can you go several days in a row without doing select count(*) on any > of your tables? > > I suspect that this is somewhat a domain specific issue. In some areas > you don't need to know the total number of rows in your tables, in > others you do. If I were you, I would have an autovacuum daemon running and rather than doing select count(*), I would look at stats generated by vacuums. They give approximate number of tuples and it should be good enough it is accurate within a percent. Just another approach of achieving same thing.. Don't be religious about running a qeury from SQL prompt. That's it.. Shridhar