Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-10-01T20:02:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>and the question as i thought was being discussed (or should be >discussed) was what is the level of interest in having this work kept in >the community cvs tree vs. someone else's quasi-forked branch... > > It is my thinking that regardless of commercial backing that the PostgreSQL project as a whole would gain better validity within the commercial world if we maintained releases longer. It is really irrelevant whether somebody pays me or you 500.00 buck to make a patch and submit it to the tree. What is relevant IMHO is that the community is backing a release for longer than 12-18 months. Yes a commercial company could just pick it up and say ... hey we will support it for x (Mammoth 7.3.4 is supported until 2005 for example) but I was more looking at this from an overall community perspective. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake >Robert Treat > > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org