Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3

Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>

From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-10-01T20:02:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>and the question as i thought was being discussed (or should be
>discussed) was what is the level of interest in having this work kept in
>the community cvs tree vs. someone else's quasi-forked branch... 
>  
>

It is my thinking that regardless of commercial backing that the 
PostgreSQL project as a whole would gain better validity
within the commercial world if we maintained releases longer.

It is really irrelevant whether somebody pays me or you 500.00 buck to 
make a patch and submit it to the tree. What is
relevant IMHO is that the community is backing a release for longer than 
12-18 months.

Yes a commercial company could just pick it up and say ... hey we will 
support it for x (Mammoth 7.3.4 is supported until 2005 for example)
but I was more looking at this from an overall community perspective.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




>Robert Treat
>  
>

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org