Re: Feature suggestions (long)

Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew@hairy.beasts.org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-05-18T05:02:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Matthew Kirkwood wrote:

>On Sat, 17 May 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>>I'm going suggest a feature like what Oracle calls "partitions" and later on
>>>>something with indexes. The idea is to generate some discussion to see if
>>>>they are worthy of being added to the TODO list.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Why bother?
>>>      
>>>
>>Maybe one can put different partitions in different tablespaces?
>>    
>>
>
>One can.  The tablespace a partition is in can even be
>offline if Oracle can prove that a query doesn't require
>that partition.
>  
>

Being able to "segment" tables for admin purposes (like archiving) might 
be beneficial.

I guess this could be orthogonal to clustering or partitioning schemes 
that mininize table/index access for queries.

(Oracle has sort of rolled these ideas together with their partitioning)

Mark