Re: Feature suggestions (long)
Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew@hairy.beasts.org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-05-18T05:02:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Matthew Kirkwood wrote: >On Sat, 17 May 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > >>>>I'm going suggest a feature like what Oracle calls "partitions" and later on >>>>something with indexes. The idea is to generate some discussion to see if >>>>they are worthy of being added to the TODO list. >>>> >>>> >>>Why bother? >>> >>> >>Maybe one can put different partitions in different tablespaces? >> >> > >One can. The tablespace a partition is in can even be >offline if Oracle can prove that a query doesn't require >that partition. > > Being able to "segment" tables for admin purposes (like archiving) might be beneficial. I guess this could be orthogonal to clustering or partitioning schemes that mininize table/index access for queries. (Oracle has sort of rolled these ideas together with their partitioning) Mark