Re: constraint with reference to the same table
Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au>
From: Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au>
To:
Cc: Postgres Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-05-15T00:53:09Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Victor, I see. Good point. Thank you kindly. Regards Rudi. Victor Yegorov wrote: >* Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au> [15.05.2003 02:59]: > > >>Hi, >> >>Can I confirm what this means then .. >> >>For large table's each column with ref. inegritry I should create an >>index on those columns ? >> >> > >I think, that indicies are needed only at delete stage to decrease search >time of possible referencing rows. >Not only, of course, but when we speak about >INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE data it is so. > >On the other side, indicies increases total query runtime, because for >each row deleted/updated/inserted it'll be necessary to update each index. > >In my case, I at first drop "cyclic" constraints, do the job and then >restore them. > > > >