Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
From: Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
To: Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, Guy Fraser <guy@incentre.net>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-04-15T22:21:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
How much different *IS* one distro from another? Network Administrator wrote: > I've heard that about Debian and SUSE too actually. It still (unfortunately) > comes down to market penetration- even for open source. I just tell folks to > try our a couple of disto or OS' in general an see which one mates to your > personality best... > > Of course I am 3-0 in converting people from RedHat/Mandrake to Slackware. > > *grin* > > > Quoting Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>: > > >>I heard that the debian rev system is MUCH better, but never got accepted >>because of the market weight of RH. Is this so? >> >>Network Administrator wrote: >> >>>When you say "forces upgrades" what do you mean? >>> >>>I might do things differently- I download the tarball, compile, dump and >> >>restore >> >>>my system. I've never have Postgres **not** compile on my Slackware boxes >> >>but >> >>>I've had **tons** of issues with RPM disto's (I've consulted on RedHat & >>>Mandrake personally) with even smaller packages things so I don't use it >> >>much. >> >>>Seems to me you should **always** be able to compile software. >>> >>>-$0.02 >>> >> >> >>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? >> >>http://archives.postgresql.org >> > > >