Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
To: Guy Fraser <guy@incentre.net>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-04-15T18:35:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Most OS people screw things up between major revisions.

 From watching friends and also this list, the lesson is just what you stated:

Do a full system backup before any major revision changes in any software 
whatsoever. It's saved my but once. I lost the entire registry in windows95 
once. Fortunately, after doing a file compare, I found that was the only file 
corrupted, and restored a 3 month old one. I had to reinstall a few programs and 
delete the registry entries for some that were no longer resident. But it was 
better than reinstalling EVERYTHING, including OS patches.

At the current moment, I keep a full harddrive backup of the harddrives in my 
box on older machines. What to do with WinXP, i don't know yet. In fact, I don't 
know how to do a drive copy with Linux either. something else to learn, I guess.

Guy Fraser wrote:
> Bob Kline wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>
>> [ Very throrough and thoughtful reply, ending ...]
>>
>>  
>>
>>> So, unless some things change at fundamental levels, it's going to
>>> remain a problem.  The lesson is to always do an ASCII dump before an
>>> OS upgrade.  PostgreSQL is not the only program that can be borked in
>>> an OS upgrade, either
>>>
> What a mess...
> RH has fouled up a lot of stuff lately...
> I'm not even going to go there...
> :-(
> 
>> Thanks very much for your excellent reply, and for your efforts to make
>> things better.  I've learned my lesson for the future.  I hope these
>> problems won't drive away too many prospective PostgreSQL users.
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>