Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues
Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
From: Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
To: Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>
Cc: Kyle <kyle@ccidomain.com>, Forum - Postgresql General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-04-10T17:08:20Z
Lists: pgsql-general
If it does, then the first PC based multimedia system will fially be born. Actually, the reverse of nice is needed for that; I need X amount of mips and Y amount of I/O to run, should be a valid API call. THEN, multimedia apps can be waht they're supposed to be. Doug McNaught wrote: > Kyle <kyle@ccidomain.com> writes: > > >>Shridhar has a good point using nice. I know RedHat supports nice >>because I have installed a totally background program that uses "nice >>19" as part of its command line. > > > He's talking about honoring 'nice' for I/O scheduling, which is > in addition to the standard modification of CPU priority. Linux > doesn't currently do this in 2.4--it was discussed for 2.5 but I don't > know if it has gone in yet. > > -Doug > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >