Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
From: Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Cc: Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-03-13T07:33:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing wrote: > Tom Lane kirjutas K, 12.03.2003 kell 18:19: > >>Actually, my hope is to eliminate that business entirely by >>standardizing the on-the-wire representation for binary data; note the >>reference to send/receive routines in the original message. For integer >>data this is simple enough: network byte order will be it. I'm not sure >>yet what to do about float data. > > > Use IEEE floats or just report the representation in startup packet. > > the X11 protocol does this for all data, even integers - the client > expresses a wish what it wants and the server tells it what it gets (so > two intel boxes need not to convert to "network byte order" at both > ends). IIOP/CDR behaves similarly for performance reasons- "receiver makes it right". It also defines a representation for all of the CORBA idl basic types, wide characters, fixed-point types, structures, etc. A far-reaching, wild suggestion would be to replace the postmaster with a CORBA-based server process with a well defined interface. At a minimum, if a binary protocol is the ultimate destination, perhaps some of the mapping of various types could be borrowed from the specs. Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com