Re: 7.4?
Medi Montaseri <medi.montaseri@intransa.com>
From: Medi Montaseri <medi.montaseri@intransa.com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: "Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>,
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, Joe Tomcat <tomcat@mobile.mp>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-02-26T19:31:38Z
Lists: pgsql-general
How about a feature as in Informix where you could specify a database_id where then thru a realm.conf file you map that id to a hostname:databasename then saying database.schema.table mapps to hostname.database.schema.table This way the applications can do a bit HA or distributed DB... Neil Conway wrote: >On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:44, Ed L. wrote: > > >>And do I understand correctly the replication to be eventually >>included will be an embedded syncronous replication solution based on >>Postgres-R and the Spread GCS? >> >> > >No, I don't think that's set in stone (although I can't speak for the >core team). While I think Postgres-R is promising, there might be room >for additional replication implementations that cater to different sets >of requirements. > >IMHO, eventually providing solutions for both synchronous and >asynchronous replication would be a good idea. > >Cheers, > >Neil > >