Re: location of the configuration files
Mark Woodward <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>
From: mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>, Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>, Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>, Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>
Date: 2003-02-15T14:48:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat wrote: >Seems like some are saying one of the problems with the current system >is it doesn't follow FHS or LSB. If those are valid reasons to change >the system, it seems like a change which doesn't actually address those >concerns would not be acceptable. (Unless those really aren't valid >concerns...) > > > I did not start this thread to make PostgreSQL FHS compatible, someone else brought that up. As I said somewhere else, I'm an old fashioned UNIX guy, capability without policy. The patch that I submitted for 7.3.2 will allow the user to configure PostgreSQL with a configuration file outside the $PGDATA directory. That's all I care about. If someone wants to get on the FHS bandwagon, that's fine. PostgreSQL should allow that ability but should not require it.