Re: location of the configuration files

Mark Woodward <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>

From: mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>, Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>, Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>, Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>
Date: 2003-02-15T14:48:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat wrote:

>Seems like some are saying one of the problems with the current system
>is it doesn't follow FHS or LSB. If those are valid reasons to change
>the system, it seems like a change which doesn't actually address those
>concerns would not be acceptable. (Unless those really aren't valid
>concerns...)
>
>  
>
I did not start this thread to make PostgreSQL FHS compatible, someone 
else brought that up.

As I said somewhere else, I'm an old fashioned UNIX guy, capability 
without policy. The patch that I submitted for 7.3.2 will allow the user 
to configure PostgreSQL with a configuration file outside the $PGDATA 
directory. That's all I care about. If someone wants to get on the FHS 
bandwagon, that's fine. PostgreSQL should allow that ability but should 
not require it.