Re: Big 7.4 items

Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-12-13T07:05:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 13 Dec 2002 at 1:22, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Replication
> 
> 	I have talked to Darren Johnson and I believe 7.4 is the time to
> 	merge the Postgres-R source tree into our main CVS.  Most of the
> 	replication code will be in its own directory, with only minor
> 	changes to our existing tree.  They have single-master
> 	replication working now, so we may have that feature in some
> 	capacity for 7.4.  I know others are working on replication
> 	solutions.  This is probably the time to decide for certain if
> 	this is the direction we want to go for replication.  Most who
> 	have have studied Postgres-R feel it is the most promising
> 	multi-master replication solution for reliably networked hosts.
> 
> Comments?

Some.

1) What kind of replication are we looking at? log file replay/syncnronous etc. 
If it is real time, like usogres( I hope I am in line with things here), that 
would be real good .Choice is always good..

2 If we are going to have replication, can we have built in load balancing? Is 
it a good idea to have it in postgresql or a separate application would be way 
to go?

And where are nested transactions?



Bye
 Shridhar

--
Booker's Law:	An ounce of application is worth a ton of abstraction.