Re: possible vacuum improvement?
Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-09-03T07:59:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3 Sep 2002 at 15:39, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Actually that's what I did. Update global transaction counter > > than trigger the > > vacuum from a spare thread. > > > > but having it in DB has advantages of centralisation. It's just a > > good to have > > kind of thing.. > > Care to submit it as a BSD licensed contrib module then? Or at least create > a project for it on http://gborg.postgresql.org/ ? Sounds like a nice idea. I would do that by this week end, once I finalise the details about it. Give me couple of days to finish it. Will come back soon with that.. Bye Shridhar -- Reporter, n.: A writer who guesses his way to the truth and dispels it with a tempest of words. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"