Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types

> That's what I was thinking. In cases where you want to use the type for
> several functions, use CREATE TYPE. If you only need the type for one
> function, let the function creation process manage it for you.

It would be nice then to have some mechanism for converting the
"automatic type" to a named type which could be used elsewhere.
Otherwise one would need to garbage collect the separate stuff later,
which would probably go into the "not so convenient" category of
features...

                   - Thomas