Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-04T06:58:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >>I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt >>too much. But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN? In >>particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1? > No, I thought we saw the number, was 30%? No, we did a test for 64. > Can someone get us that number for 128? > I'll do 32, 64, and 128 and report back on template1 size. Joe