Re: timeout implementation issues
Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman@dynamicdiagrams.com>, Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-04-07T23:55:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Probably I'm misunderstanding this thread. > > > > Why must the query_timeout be reset particularly ? > > > > What's wrong with simply issueing set query_timeout > > > > command just before every query ? > > > > > > You could do that, but we also imagine cases where people would want to > > > set a timeout for each query in an entire session. > > > > Sorry I couldn't understand your point. > > It seems the simplest and the most certain way is to call > > 'SET QUERY_TIMEOUT per query. The way dosen't require > > RESET at all. Is the overhead an issue ? > > What about psql and libpq. Doing a timeout before every query is a > pain. Psql and libpq would simply issue the query according to the user's request as they currently do. What's pain with it ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue