Re: Suggestions please: names for function
mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-04-03T16:46:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Tom Lane writes: > > > mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes: > > > (1) const or constant > > > (2) cacheable > > > (3) volatile > > > > I was wondering about "const" for case 1, also. I think there is some > > precedent for using "const" with this meaning in other programming > > languages. > > I think the meaning of "const" tends to be "cannot change the result" -- > which may actually make sense in SQL in a future life if you can pass > around table descriptors or cursor references. A function, such as sin(x) could be considered constant for the result based on value 'x'