Re: Call for platforms

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: lockhart@fourpalms.org, scrappy@hub.org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-04-06T05:29:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bottom line:  7.1RC1 passes most of the regression tests on
> NetBSD/macppc.  It's probably good enough for normal use since the
> differences are not extensive, but someone would need to look at the
> diff's for longer than the 10 seconds or so I've spent so far, and
> someone should actually set it up for real use to check that.

I'll mark it as supported; the horology diffs are not significant and
geometry is known to be a bit different on some platforms.

Including the not-tested-for-7.1 NetBSD/m68k, we are supported on 30
platforms for the upcoming release, with definite potential for a couple
of more (QNX and Ultrix).

*That* is some sort of milestone! :))

                    - Thomas