Re: Performance monitor
Justin Clift <aa2@bigpond.net.au>
From: Justin Clift <aa2@bigpond.net.au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-08T03:14:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Mike Mascari's idea (er... his assembling of the other ideas) still sounds like the Best Solution though. :-) + Justin +++ I like the idea of updating shared memory with the performance statistics, current query execution information, etc., providing a function to fetch those statistics, and perhaps providing a system view (i.e. pg_performance) based upon such functions which can be queried by the administrator. FWIW, Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com +++ Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I think Bruce wants per-backend data, and this approach would seem to only > > get the data for the current backend. > > > > Also, I really don't like the proposal to write files to /tmp. If we want a > > perf tool, then we need to have something like 'top', which will > > continuously update. With 40 backends, the idea of writing 40 file to /tmp > > every second seems a little excessive to me. > > My idea was to use 'ps' to gather most of the information, and just use > the internal stats when someone clicked on a backend and wanted more > information. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026