Thread

1. NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails start cause PG_VERSION

   PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org> — 2000-11-14T09:39:24Z

   Elian Carsenat (elian.carsenat@websitewatchers.co.uk) reports a bug with a severity of 2
   The lower the number the more severe it is.
   
   Short Description
   NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails start cause PG_VERSION
   
   Long Description
   NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails to start because PG_VERSION not recognized properly (windows char encoding ?)
   
   See example code.
   
   Thanks guys for your great database!
   
   Sample Code
   C:\pgsql\bin>postgres.exe  1>postgres.log
   DEBUG:  Data Base System is starting up at Tue Nov 14 09:34:39 2000
   DEBUG:  Data Base System was interrupted being in production at Tue Nov 14 09:34
   :14 2000
   DEBUG:  Data Base System is in production state at Tue Nov 14 09:34:39 2000
   FATAL 1:  Version number in file 'C:\pgsql\data/PG_VERSION' should be 7.0
   , not 7.0
   
   No file was uploaded with this report
   
   
   

2. Re: NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails start cause PG_VERSION

   Andrew McMillan <andrew@catalyst.net.nz> — 2000-11-15T06:06:00Z

   pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org wrote:
   > 
   > Elian Carsenat (elian.carsenat@websitewatchers.co.uk) reports a bug with a severity of 2
   > The lower the number the more severe it is.
   > 
   > Short Description
   > NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails start cause PG_VERSION
   > 
   > Long Description
   > NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails to start because PG_VERSION not recognized properly (windows char encoding ?)
   > 
   > See example code.
   > 
   > Thanks guys for your great database!
   > 
   > Sample Code
   > C:\pgsql\bin>postgres.exe  1>postgres.log
   > DEBUG:  Data Base System is starting up at Tue Nov 14 09:34:39 2000
   > DEBUG:  Data Base System was interrupted being in production at Tue Nov 14 09:34
   > :14 2000
   > DEBUG:  Data Base System is in production state at Tue Nov 14 09:34:39 2000
   > FATAL 1:  Version number in file 'C:\pgsql\data/PG_VERSION' should be 7.0
   > , not 7.0
   > 
   > No file was uploaded with this report
   
   From the line break in the "should be 7.0
   , not 7.0" I wonder if it isn't a CRLF vs LF problem?
   
   Regards,
   					Andrew.
   -- 
   _____________________________________________________________________
               Andrew McMillan, e-mail: Andrew@cat-it.co.nz
   Catalyst IT Ltd, PO Box 10-225, Level 22, 105 The Terrace, Wellington
   Me: +64 (21) 635 694, Fax: +64 (4) 499 5596, Office: +64 (4) 499 2267