Thread

1. AW: Re: [INTERFACES] USE OF CURSORS IN ECPG

   Zeugswetter Andreas SB <zeugswettera@wien.spardat.at> — 2000-11-10T12:10:19Z

   > PS: You might consider applying the patch for (update where > not_found) -> 100
   
   No, this is not allowed. sqlcode is supposed to be 0 in above case.
   You need to explicitly check for the number of rows updated in your
   program if needed.
   
   Andreas
   
   

2. Re: AW: Re: [INTERFACES] USE OF CURSORS IN ECPG

   Christof Petig <christof.petig@wtal.de> — 2000-11-10T12:49:33Z

   Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
   
   > > PS: You might consider applying the patch for (update where > not_found) -> 100
   >
   > No, this is not allowed. sqlcode is supposed to be 0 in above case.
   > You need to explicitly check for the number of rows updated in your
   > program if needed.
   >
   > Andreas
   
   According to my reading of the SQL standard this is the only compliant behaviour. Do
   you know better?
   
   Christof