Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Inoue, Hiroshi <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Schmidt, Peter" <peter.schmidt@prismedia.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-02-21T01:53:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- cvs.diff (text/plain) patch
Tom Lane wrote: > > > platform) i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC egcs-2.91.60(turbolinux 4.2) > > min delay) 10msec according to your test program. > > -B) 64 (all other settings are default) > > Thanks. Could I trouble you to run it again with a larger -B, say > 1024 or 2048? What I've found is that at -B 64, the benchmark is > so constrained by limited buffer space that it doesn't reflect > performance at a more realistic production setting. > Hmm the result doesn't seem that obvious. First I got the following result. [CommitDelay=0] 1)tps = 23.024648(including connections establishing) tps = 23.856420(excluding connections establishing) 2)tps = 30.276270(including connections establishing) tps = 30.996459(excluding connections establishing) [CommitDelay=1] 1)tps = 23.065921(including connections establishing) tps = 23.866029(excluding connections establishing) 2)tps = 34.024632(including connections establishing) tps = 35.671566(excluding connections establishing) The result seems inconstant and after disabling checkpoint process I got the following. [CommitDelay=0] 1)tps = 24.060970(including connections establishing) tps = 24.416851(excluding connections establishing) 2)tps = 21.361134(including connections establishing) tps = 21.605583(excluding connections establishing) 3)tps = 20.377635(including connections establishing) tps = 20.646523(excluding connections establishing) [CommitDelay=1] 1)tps = 22.164379(including connections establishing) tps = 22.790772(excluding connections establishing) 2)tps = 22.719068(including connections establishing) tps = 23.040485(excluding connections establishing) 3)tps = 24.341675(including connections establishing) tps = 25.869479(excluding connections establishing) Unfortunately I have no more time to check today. Please check the similar test case. [My test case] I created and initialized 10 datatabases as follows. 1) create databases. createdb inoue1 craetedb inoue2 . createdb inoue10 2) pgbench -i inoue1 pgbench -i inoue2 . pgbench -i inoue10 3) invoke a modified pgbench pgbench -c 10 -t 100 inoue I've attached a patch to change pgbench so that each connection connects to different database whose name is 'xxxx%d'(xxxx is the specified database? name). Regards, Hiroshi Inoue