Re: Re: couple of general questions
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
To: Gregory Wood <gregw@com-stock.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-01-20T12:00:30Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Gregory Wood wrote: > > > Does anyone else get annoyed when going on to an american site to > > register or buy something and find that the state field is only > > 2 characters long? > > Sorry, I didn't realize that many other countries had states... the only > other frame of reference that I have is Canadian Provinces, which also have > 2 character codes. Since we only do business with countries in the United > States and Canada I'm woefully ignorant of international standards. I'd also > like to apologise for our backwards use of the Imperial measurement > system... but that one is not my fault. Umm, sorry. I must have come over somewhat stronger than I intended. It was supposed to be just a passing comment. The reason I picked up on it is because it's the first thing people think of when looking for a reason for fixed length fields and (as pointed out on this thread) it's not even valid for the whole of the US. Personally, for all DB systems I build now I just make *every* text field type text and never use char()/varchar(). Everything time I think I've made it long enough, someone comes up with an example that's longer. The performance difference is marginal or non-existant. Don't think I'm attacking you, I'm just trying to help... -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com> http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/