Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Paul Govereau <pgoverea@akamai.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-01-03T09:30:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > > One thing that bothered me is that my reading of the SQL99 draft > disallows the UNDER syntax you are using. I read: > > <table definition> ::= > CREATE [ <table scope> ] TABLE <table name> > <table contents source> > [ ON COMMIT <table commit action> ROWS ] > > <table contents source> ::= > <table element list> > | OF <user-defined type> > [ <subtable clause> ] > [ <table element list> ] > > <subtable clause> ::= > UNDER <supertable clause> > > <supertable clause> ::= <supertable name> > > It looks to me like "UNDER <table name>" cannot appear without a > preceding "OF <user-defined type>". I am not clear on the semantic > implications of the OF clause. to me it seems that only this is OR-d : <table element list> | OF <user-defined type> and the rest ([ <subtable clause> ],[ <table element list> ])is just optional > Anyway, we seem to have a clear consensus to pull the UNDER clause from > the grammar and stick with INHERITS for 7.1. I will take care of that > in the next day or so. Good. ----------- Hannu