Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbers This is a continuation of c9e24573905b, containing changes included into the proposed patch that have been missed in the actual commit. I have managed to miss these diffs while doing a rebase of the original patch. Thanks to Noah Misch, Peter Eisentraut and Alexander Korotkov for the pokes. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/92fe572d-638e-4162-aef6-1c42a2936f25@eisentraut.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240810175055.cd.nmisch@google.com Backpatch-through: 17
Files
| Path | Change | +/− |
|---|---|---|
| src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | modified | +6 −6 |
| src/backend/access/transam/slru.c | modified | +1 −1 |
Discussion
- XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) 149 messages · 2022-03-17 → 2024-08-19
Cited messages not in the archive:
92fe572d-638e-4162-aef6-1c42a2936f25@eisentraut.org