Rewrite the planner's handling of materialized plan types so that there is

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Commit: 9bb342811bf6a93a574a648c5848feedbaaef8f2
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2009-09-12T22:12:09Z
Releases: 9.0.0
Rewrite the planner's handling of materialized plan types so that there is
an explicit model of rescan costs being different from first-time costs.
The costing of Material nodes in particular now has some visible relationship
to the actual runtime behavior, where before it was essentially fantasy.
This also fixes up a couple of places where different materialized plan types
were treated differently for no very good reason (probably just oversights).

A couple of the regression tests are affected, because the planner now chooses
to put the other relation on the inside of a nestloop-with-materialize.
So far as I can see both changes are sane, and the planner is now more
consistently following the expectation that it should prefer to materialize
the smaller of two relations.

Per a recent discussion with Robert Haas.

Files