I agree. I think, though, that the best argument presented in the
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
I agree. I think, though, that the best argument presented in the debate was from Paul Vixie, who wanted INET to be the name covering both IPV4 and IPV6. The following kit makes the needed changes: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Files
| Path | Change | +/− |
|---|---|---|
| doc/README.inet (from doc/README.ipaddr) | renamed | +1 −1 |
| src/backend/utils/adt/inet.c (from src/backend/utils/adt/ip.c) | renamed | +35 −33 |
| src/backend/utils/adt/mac.c | modified | +2 −2 |
| src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile | modified | +2 −2 |
| src/include/catalog/pg_opclass.h | modified | +2 −2 |
| src/include/catalog/pg_operator.h | modified | +11 −11 |
| src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h | modified | +14 −14 |
| src/include/catalog/pg_type.h | modified | +3 −3 |
| src/include/utils/builtins.h | modified | +16 −17 |
| src/include/utils/inet.h (from src/include/utils/mac.h) | renamed | +3 −3 |
| src/tools/pgindent/pgindent | modified | +1 −1 |