Horton

Renaming for new subscripting mechanism

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

View on postgr.es
Commit: 558d77f20e4e9ed18101d5d057b770ae22ece855
Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: 2019-02-01T15:50:32Z
Releases: 12.0 
Renaming for new subscripting mechanism

Over at patch https://commitfest.postgresql.org/21/1062/ Dmitry wants to
introduce a more generic subscription mechanism, which allows
subscripting not only arrays but also other object types such as JSONB.
That functionality is introduced in a largish invasive patch, out of
which this internal renaming patch was extracted.

Author: Dmitry Dolgov
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Arthur Zakirov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcUK4EqPAu7XRRO5CCjMwhz5zvg+rfWuLzVoxp_5sKS6=w@mail.gmail.com

Files

PathChange+/−
contrib/pg_stat_statements/pg_stat_statements.c modified +6 −6
contrib/postgres_fdw/deparse.c modified +15 −15
src/backend/executor/execExpr.c modified +90 −85
src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c modified +107 −107
src/backend/jit/llvm/llvmjit.c modified +2 −2
src/backend/jit/llvm/llvmjit_expr.c modified +9 −9
src/backend/jit/llvm/llvmjit_types.c modified +1 −1
src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c modified +7 −7
src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c modified +4 −4
src/backend/nodes/nodeFuncs.c modified +33 −31
src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c modified +5 −5
src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c modified +7 −7
src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c modified +9 −5
src/backend/parser/analyze.c modified +5 −4
src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c modified +14 −14
src/backend/parser/parse_node.c modified +88 −79
src/backend/parser/parse_target.c modified +26 −26
src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c modified +14 −12
src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c modified +46 −42
src/include/executor/execExpr.h modified +28 −28
src/include/jit/llvmjit.h modified +1 −1
src/include/nodes/nodes.h modified +1 −1
src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h modified +1 −1
src/include/nodes/primnodes.h modified +29 −25
src/include/parser/parse_node.h modified +9 −8
src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c modified +2 −2

Discussion