Fix thinko in lock mode enum

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

Commit: 51742063be4fd8d58fb8571e559fe8ca0abbbb57
Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: 2015-01-04T18:48:29Z
Releases: 9.4.1
Fix thinko in lock mode enum

Commit 0e5680f4737a9c6aa94aa9e77543e5de60411322 contained a thinko
mixing LOCKMODE with LockTupleMode.  This caused misbehavior in the case
where a tuple is marked with a multixact with at most a FOR SHARE lock,
and another transaction tries to acquire a FOR NO KEY EXCLUSIVE lock;
this case should block but doesn't.

Include a new isolation tester spec file to explicitely try all the
tuple lock combinations; without the fix it shows the problem:

    starting permutation: s1_begin s1_lcksvpt s1_tuplock2 s2_tuplock3 s1_commit
    step s1_begin: BEGIN;
    step s1_lcksvpt: SELECT * FROM multixact_conflict FOR KEY SHARE; SAVEPOINT foo;
    a

    1
    step s1_tuplock2: SELECT * FROM multixact_conflict FOR SHARE;
    a

    1
    step s2_tuplock3: SELECT * FROM multixact_conflict FOR NO KEY UPDATE;
    a

    1
    step s1_commit: COMMIT;

With the fixed code, step s2_tuplock3 blocks until session 1 commits,
which is the correct behavior.

All other cases behave correctly.

Backpatch to 9.3, like the commit that introduced the problem.

Files