Avoid assuming that we know the spelling of getopt_long's error messages.
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Avoid assuming that we know the spelling of getopt_long's error messages. I've had enough of "fixing" this test case. Whatever value it has is limited to verifying that pgbench fails for an unrecognized switch, and we don't need to assume anything about what getopt_long prints in order to do that. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9427.1547701450@sss.pgh.pa.us
Files
| Path | Change | +/− |
|---|---|---|
| src/bin/pgbench/t/002_pgbench_no_server.pl | modified | +1 −1 |
Discussion
- PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD 37 messages · 2019-01-17 → 2019-01-24