In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock on

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Commit: 2c66dcf684137fdcc4371fd0aeb736a2f6458c36
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2004-10-25T15:42:02Z
Releases: 8.0.0
In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock on
the parent table, it's essential that all index accesses take some kind
of lock on the index.  I had missed vacuumlazy.c :-( ...

Files

PathChange+/−
src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c modified +17 −7