v2-0002-Ensure-vacuum-removes-all-visibly-dead-tuples-old.patch

text/x-patch

Filename: v2-0002-Ensure-vacuum-removes-all-visibly-dead-tuples-old.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Part: 0
Message: Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin

Patch

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/attachments/:id/patch the parsed metadata as JSON — format, series position, per-file stats; never the diff bytes. API reference →
Format: format-patch
Series: patch v2-0002
Subject: Ensure vacuum removes all visibly dead tuples older than OldestXmin
File+
src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c 22 1
src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c 7 7
From 7ecc180c4762c258dab01c7929c90a9c8e48c95b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:21:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] Ensure vacuum removes all visibly dead tuples older
 than OldestXmin

If vacuum fails to remove a tuple with xmax older than
VacuumCutoffs->OldestXmin and younger than GlobalVisState->maybe_needed,
it may attempt to freeze the tuple's xmax and then ERROR out in
pre-freeze checks with "cannot freeze committed xmax".

Fix this by having vacuum always remove tuples older than OldestXmin.

It is possible for GlobalVisState->maybe_needed to precede OldestXmin if
maybe_needed is forced to go backward while vacuum is running. This can
happen if a disconnected standby with a running transaction older than
VacuumCutoffs->OldestXmin reconnects to the primary after vacuum
initially calculates GlobalVisState and OldestXmin.

In back branches starting with 14, failing to remove tuples older than
OldestXmin during pruning caused vacuum to infinitely loop in
lazy_scan_prune(), as investigated on this [1] thread. After 1ccc1e05ae
removed the retry loop in lazy_scan_prune() and stopped comparing tuples
to OldestXmin, the hang could no longer happen, but we could still
attempt to freeze dead tuples with xmax older than OldestXmin --
resulting in an ERROR.

Fix this by always removing dead tuples with xmax older than
VacuumCutoffs->OldestXmin. This is okay because the standby won't replay
the tuple removal until the tuple is removable. Thus, the worst that can
happen is a recovery conflict.

[1] https://postgr.es/m/20240415173913.4zyyrwaftujxthf2%40awork3.anarazel.de#1b216b7768b5bd577a3d3d51bd5aadee

Back-patch through 14

Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan, Robert Haas, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, and Noah Misch
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bDD7oq9ZwB2OJqub5BovMG6UjEYsoK2LVttadjEqyRGg%40mail.gmail.com
---
 src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c  | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c | 14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c b/src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c
index 3cdfc5b7f1b..869d82ad667 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c
@@ -325,6 +325,8 @@ heap_page_prune_opt(Relation relation, Buffer buffer)
  *
  * cutoffs contains the freeze cutoffs, established by VACUUM at the beginning
  * of vacuuming the relation.  Required if HEAP_PRUNE_FREEZE option is set.
+ * cutoffs->OldestXmin is also used to determine if dead tuples are
+ * HEAPTUPLE_RECENTLY_DEAD or HEAPTUPLE_DEAD.
  *
  * presult contains output parameters needed by callers, such as the number of
  * tuples removed and the offsets of dead items on the page after pruning.
@@ -922,8 +924,27 @@ heap_prune_satisfies_vacuum(PruneState *prstate, HeapTuple tup, Buffer buffer)
 	if (res != HEAPTUPLE_RECENTLY_DEAD)
 		return res;
 
+	/*
+	 * For VACUUM, we must be sure to prune tuples with xmax older than
+	 * OldestXmin -- a visibility cutoff determined at the beginning of
+	 * vacuuming the relation. OldestXmin is used for freezing determination
+	 * and we cannot freeze dead tuples' xmaxes.
+	 */
+	if (prstate->cutoffs &&
+		TransactionIdIsValid(prstate->cutoffs->OldestXmin) &&
+		NormalTransactionIdPrecedes(dead_after, prstate->cutoffs->OldestXmin))
+		return HEAPTUPLE_DEAD;
+
+	/*
+	 * Determine whether or not the tuple is considered dead when compared
+	 * with the provided GlobalVisState. On-access pruning does not provide
+	 * VacuumCutoffs. And for vacuum, even if the tuple's xmax is not older
+	 * than OldestXmin, GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid() could find the row dead
+	 * if the GlobalVisState has been updated since the beginning of vacuuming
+	 * the relation.
+	 */
 	if (GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid(prstate->vistest, dead_after))
-		res = HEAPTUPLE_DEAD;
+		return HEAPTUPLE_DEAD;
 
 	return res;
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c b/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c
index 3f88cf1e8ef..abb47ae5960 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c
@@ -438,13 +438,13 @@ heap_vacuum_rel(Relation rel, VacuumParams *params,
 	 * as an upper bound on the XIDs stored in the pages we'll actually scan
 	 * (NewRelfrozenXid tracking must never be allowed to miss unfrozen XIDs).
 	 *
-	 * Next acquire vistest, a related cutoff that's used in pruning.  We
-	 * expect vistest will always make heap_page_prune_and_freeze() remove any
-	 * deleted tuple whose xmax is < OldestXmin.  lazy_scan_prune must never
-	 * become confused about whether a tuple should be frozen or removed.  (In
-	 * the future we might want to teach lazy_scan_prune to recompute vistest
-	 * from time to time, to increase the number of dead tuples it can prune
-	 * away.)
+	 * Next acquire vistest, a related cutoff that's used in pruning.  We use
+	 * vistest in combination with OldestXmin to ensure that
+	 * heap_page_prune_and_freeze() always removes any deleted tuple whose
+	 * xmax is < OldestXmin.  lazy_scan_prune must never become confused about
+	 * whether a tuple should be frozen or removed.  (In the future we might
+	 * want to teach lazy_scan_prune to recompute vistest from time to time,
+	 * to increase the number of dead tuples it can prune away.)
 	 */
 	vacrel->aggressive = vacuum_get_cutoffs(rel, params, &vacrel->cutoffs);
 	vacrel->rel_pages = orig_rel_pages = RelationGetNumberOfBlocks(rel);
-- 
2.34.1