v3-0001-Remove-obsolete-comment.patch

From dc53b7ddfc5aa004a0d222b4084a1c580f05a296 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:15:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/8] Remove obsolete comment

The idea to use a union in the definition of RangeTblEntry is clearly
not being pursued.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4b27fc50-8cd6-46f5-ab20-88dbaadca645@eisentraut.org
---
 src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
index 2380821600..5113f97363 100644
--- a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
+++ b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
@@ -1028,12 +1028,6 @@ typedef struct RangeTblEntry
 
 	RTEKind		rtekind;		/* see above */
 
-	/*
-	 * XXX the fields applicable to only some rte kinds should be merged into
-	 * a union.  I didn't do this yet because the diffs would impact a lot of
-	 * code that is being actively worked on.  FIXME someday.
-	 */
-
 	/*
 	 * Fields valid for a plain relation RTE (else zero):
 	 *

base-commit: af0e7deb4a1c369bb8154ac55f085d6a93fe5c35
-- 
2.44.0