difffile
text/x-diff
Filename: difffile
Type: text/x-diff
Part: 0
Patch
Format: context
| File | + | − |
|---|---|---|
| README.pg_autovacuum | 34 | 6 |
*** README.pg_autovacuum.orig Thu Nov 20 19:58:29 2003
--- README.pg_autovacuum Thu Nov 20 20:35:34 2003
***************
*** 141,163 ****
depending on the mixture of table activity (insert, update, or
delete):
! - If the number of (inserts + updates + deletes) > AnalyzeThreshold, then
only an analyze is performed.
! - If the number of (deletes + updates) > VacuumThreshold, then a
vacuum analyze is performed.
VacuumThreshold is equal to:
! vacuum_base_value + (vacuum_scaling_factor * "number of tuples in the table")
!
AnalyzeThreshold is equal to:
! analyze_base_value + (analyze_scaling_factor * "number of tuples in the table")
!
The AnalyzeThreshold defaults to half of the VacuumThreshold since it
represents a much less expensive operation (approx 5%-10% of vacuum),
and running ANALYZE more often should not substantially degrade system
performance.
Sleeping:
---------
--- 141,191 ----
depending on the mixture of table activity (insert, update, or
delete):
! - If the number of (inserts + updates + deletes) >= AnalyzeThreshold, then
only an analyze is performed.
! - If the number of (deletes + updates) >= VacuumThreshold, then a
vacuum analyze is performed.
VacuumThreshold is equal to:
! vacuum_base_value + (vacuum_scaling_factor * "number of tuples in the
! table")
AnalyzeThreshold is equal to:
! analyze_base_value + (analyze_scaling_factor * "number of tuples in the
! table")
The AnalyzeThreshold defaults to half of the VacuumThreshold since it
represents a much less expensive operation (approx 5%-10% of vacuum),
and running ANALYZE more often should not substantially degrade system
performance.
+ Examples:
+
+ Following table shows typical usage of pg_autovacuum settings.
+ These are put here so that a DBA can have some starting point while
+ tuning pg_autovacuum.
+
+ Vacuum is triggered by updates and deletes. So in case of vacuum,
+ last column indicates total of updates and deletes required
+ to trigger vacuum. In case of analyze, the operations would count total
+ number of inserts, updates and deletes.
+
+ Base Scaling factor Records No. of Operations
+ 1,000 1 10,000 11,000
+ 1,000 2 10,000 21,000
+ 1,000 0.5 10,000 6,000
+ 1,000 0.1 10,000 2,000
+
+ Although analyze is cheaper operation compared to vacuum,
+ it might be needed less often. The default is to analyze twice as much as
+ vacuum but that might be too aggressive for some installations. It is advised
+ thatsuch installation tune their analyze threshold separately, rather than
+ relying upon the default behaviour.
+
+ Furthermore, for aggressive vacuum/analyze behaviour, it is recommended that
+ scaling factor is set to less than 1. However too aggresive operation can affect
+ performance of normal database operations adversely. Do not apply such setting
+ to production databases without prior testing.
+
Sleeping:
---------