master_v3-0001-Fix-a-race-condition-of-updating-procArray-replic.patch
application/octet-stream
Filename: master_v3-0001-Fix-a-race-condition-of-updating-procArray-replic.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Part: 0
Patch
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/attachments/:id/patch
the parsed metadata as JSON — format, series position, per-file stats; never the diff bytes.
API reference →
Format: format-patch
Series: patch v3-0001
Subject: Fix a race condition of updating procArray->replication_slot_xmin.
| File | + | − |
|---|---|---|
| src/backend/replication/slot.c | 14 | 1 |
| src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c | 3 | 10 |
| src/include/storage/procarray.h | 1 | 1 |
From e06e44ce9930793f5a0383580db8ebb3e9b6a6b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:25:57 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v3] Fix a race condition of updating
procArray->replication_slot_xmin.
Previously, if already_locked is false,
ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin() computed the oldest xmin across
all slots while not holding the ProcArrayLock and acquires the
ProcArrayLock just before updating the
replication_slot_xmin. Therefore, it was possible that by the time a
process computes the oldest xmin and before updating the
replication_slot_xmin, another process computes and updates it. As a
result, the replication_slot_xmin could be overwritten with an old
value and retreated.
In the reported failure, after a walsender who was creating a
replication slot updated the replication_slot_xmin via
CreateInitDecodingContext(), another walsender overwrote it with
InvalidTransactionId. Then the walsender creating the replication slot
ended up computing the oldest safe decoding transaction id without
considering the replication_slot_xmin. That led to an error "cannot
build an initial slot snapshot as oldest safe xid %u follows
snapshot's xmin %u", which was an assertion failure prior to
240e0dbacd3.
This commit changes ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin() so that it
computes the oldest xmin while holding the ProcArrayLock in exclusive
mode. We keep already_locked parameter in
ProcArraySetReplicationSlotXmin() on backbranches to not break ABI
compatibility.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1L8wYcyTPxNzPGkhuO52WBGoOZbT0A73Le=ZUWYAYmdfw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
---
src/backend/replication/slot.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c | 13 +++----------
src/include/storage/procarray.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/slot.c b/src/backend/replication/slot.c
index f286918f69..063f6aa95c 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/slot.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/slot.c
@@ -840,6 +840,16 @@ ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin(bool already_locked)
Assert(ReplicationSlotCtl != NULL);
+ /*
+ * It is possible that by the time we compute the agg_xmin here and before
+ * updating replication_slot_xmin, the CreateInitDecodingContext() will
+ * compute and update replication_slot_xmin. So, we need to acquire
+ * ProcArrayLock here to avoid retreating the value of
+ * replication_slot_xmin.
+ */
+ if (!already_locked)
+ LWLockAcquire(ProcArrayLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+
LWLockAcquire(ReplicationSlotControlLock, LW_SHARED);
for (i = 0; i < max_replication_slots; i++)
@@ -878,7 +888,10 @@ ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin(bool already_locked)
LWLockRelease(ReplicationSlotControlLock);
- ProcArraySetReplicationSlotXmin(agg_xmin, agg_catalog_xmin, already_locked);
+ ProcArraySetReplicationSlotXmin(agg_xmin, agg_catalog_xmin);
+
+ if (!already_locked)
+ LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock);
}
/*
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
index 4340bf9641..a9e4f59440 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
@@ -3896,23 +3896,16 @@ TerminateOtherDBBackends(Oid databaseId)
*
* Install limits to future computations of the xmin horizon to prevent vacuum
* and HOT pruning from removing affected rows still needed by clients with
- * replication slots.
+ * replication slots. The caller must hold ProcArrayLock in exclusive mode.
*/
void
-ProcArraySetReplicationSlotXmin(TransactionId xmin, TransactionId catalog_xmin,
- bool already_locked)
+ProcArraySetReplicationSlotXmin(TransactionId xmin, TransactionId catalog_xmin)
{
- Assert(!already_locked || LWLockHeldByMe(ProcArrayLock));
-
- if (!already_locked)
- LWLockAcquire(ProcArrayLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+ Assert(LWLockHeldByMeInMode(ProcArrayLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE));
procArray->replication_slot_xmin = xmin;
procArray->replication_slot_catalog_xmin = catalog_xmin;
- if (!already_locked)
- LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock);
-
elog(DEBUG1, "xmin required by slots: data %u, catalog %u",
xmin, catalog_xmin);
}
diff --git a/src/include/storage/procarray.h b/src/include/storage/procarray.h
index d8cae3ce1c..b7554f1b53 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/procarray.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/procarray.h
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ extern void XidCacheRemoveRunningXids(TransactionId xid,
TransactionId latestXid);
extern void ProcArraySetReplicationSlotXmin(TransactionId xmin,
- TransactionId catalog_xmin, bool already_locked);
+ TransactionId catalog_xmin);
extern void ProcArrayGetReplicationSlotXmin(TransactionId *xmin,
TransactionId *catalog_xmin);
--
2.31.1