v2-0001-Lock-updated-tuples-in-tuple_update-and-tuple_del.patch

From f5e5764090c79e44be5fd58d9587b59384c955b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 22:07:12 +0300
Subject: [PATCH v2] Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()

---
 src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c |  99 ++++++++--
 src/backend/access/table/tableam.c       |   6 +-
 src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c   | 227 ++++++++---------------
 src/include/access/tableam.h             |  20 +-
 4 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
index c4b1916d36e..dfc4eb1d3b5 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
 #include "utils/builtins.h"
 #include "utils/rel.h"
 
+static TM_Result heapam_tuple_lock_internal(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid,
+											Snapshot snapshot, TupleTableSlot *slot,
+											CommandId cid, LockTupleMode mode,
+											LockWaitPolicy wait_policy, uint8 flags,
+											TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool updated);
+
 static void reform_and_rewrite_tuple(HeapTuple tuple,
 									 Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
 									 Datum *values, bool *isnull, RewriteState rwstate);
@@ -299,14 +305,38 @@ heapam_tuple_complete_speculative(Relation relation, TupleTableSlot *slot,
 static TM_Result
 heapam_tuple_delete(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, CommandId cid,
 					Snapshot snapshot, Snapshot crosscheck, bool wait,
-					TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool changingPart)
+					TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool changingPart,
+					bool lockUpdated, TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
 {
+	TM_Result	result;
+
 	/*
 	 * Currently Deleting of index tuples are handled at vacuum, in case if
 	 * the storage itself is cleaning the dead tuples by itself, it is the
 	 * time to call the index tuple deletion also.
 	 */
-	return heap_delete(relation, tid, cid, crosscheck, wait, tmfd, changingPart);
+	result = heap_delete(relation, tid, cid, crosscheck, wait, tmfd, changingPart);
+
+	if (result == TM_Updated && lockUpdated)
+	{
+		bool		updated = false;
+
+		if (!ItemPointerIndicatesMovedPartitions(&tmfd->ctid))
+			updated = true;
+		result = heapam_tuple_lock_internal(relation, tid, snapshot,
+											lockedSlot, cid, LockTupleExclusive,
+											LockWaitBlock,
+											TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION,
+											tmfd, updated);
+
+		if (result == TM_Ok)
+		{
+			tmfd->traversed = true;
+			return TM_Updated;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return result;
 }
 
 
@@ -314,7 +344,8 @@ static TM_Result
 heapam_tuple_update(Relation relation, ItemPointer otid, TupleTableSlot *slot,
 					CommandId cid, Snapshot snapshot, Snapshot crosscheck,
 					bool wait, TM_FailureData *tmfd,
-					LockTupleMode *lockmode, bool *update_indexes)
+					LockTupleMode *lockmode, bool *update_indexes,
+					bool lockUpdated, TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
 {
 	bool		shouldFree = true;
 	HeapTuple	tuple = ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple(slot, true, &shouldFree);
@@ -341,14 +372,34 @@ heapam_tuple_update(Relation relation, ItemPointer otid, TupleTableSlot *slot,
 	if (shouldFree)
 		pfree(tuple);
 
+	if (result == TM_Updated && lockUpdated)
+	{
+		bool		updated = false;
+
+		if (!ItemPointerIndicatesMovedPartitions(&tmfd->ctid))
+			updated = true;
+
+		result = heapam_tuple_lock_internal(relation, otid, snapshot,
+											lockedSlot, cid, *lockmode,
+											LockWaitBlock,
+											TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION,
+											tmfd, updated);
+
+		if (result == TM_Ok)
+		{
+			tmfd->traversed = true;
+			return TM_Updated;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return result;
 }
 
 static TM_Result
-heapam_tuple_lock(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, Snapshot snapshot,
-				  TupleTableSlot *slot, CommandId cid, LockTupleMode mode,
-				  LockWaitPolicy wait_policy, uint8 flags,
-				  TM_FailureData *tmfd)
+heapam_tuple_lock_internal(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, Snapshot snapshot,
+						   TupleTableSlot *slot, CommandId cid, LockTupleMode mode,
+						   LockWaitPolicy wait_policy, uint8 flags,
+						   TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool updated)
 {
 	BufferHeapTupleTableSlot *bslot = (BufferHeapTupleTableSlot *) slot;
 	TM_Result	result;
@@ -363,16 +414,30 @@ heapam_tuple_lock(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, Snapshot snapshot,
 
 tuple_lock_retry:
 	tuple->t_self = *tid;
-	result = heap_lock_tuple(relation, tuple, cid, mode, wait_policy,
-							 follow_updates, &buffer, tmfd);
+	if (!updated)
+	{
+		result = heap_lock_tuple(relation, tuple, cid, mode, wait_policy,
+								 follow_updates, &buffer, tmfd);
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		result = TM_Updated;
+	}
 
 	if (result == TM_Updated &&
 		(flags & TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION))
 	{
-		/* Should not encounter speculative tuple on recheck */
-		Assert(!HeapTupleHeaderIsSpeculative(tuple->t_data));
+		if (!updated)
+		{
+			/* Should not encounter speculative tuple on recheck */
+			Assert(!HeapTupleHeaderIsSpeculative(tuple->t_data));
 
-		ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
+			ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			updated = false;
+		}
 
 		if (!ItemPointerEquals(&tmfd->ctid, &tuple->t_self))
 		{
@@ -559,6 +624,16 @@ tuple_lock_retry:
 	return result;
 }
 
+static TM_Result
+heapam_tuple_lock(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, Snapshot snapshot,
+				  TupleTableSlot *slot, CommandId cid, LockTupleMode mode,
+				  LockWaitPolicy wait_policy, uint8 flags,
+				  TM_FailureData *tmfd)
+{
+	return heapam_tuple_lock_internal(relation, tid, snapshot, slot, cid, mode,
+									  wait_policy, flags, tmfd, false);
+}
+
 
 /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  * DDL related callbacks for heap AM.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/table/tableam.c b/src/backend/access/table/tableam.c
index ef0d34fceee..f3476697ff0 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/table/tableam.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/table/tableam.c
@@ -306,7 +306,8 @@ simple_table_tuple_delete(Relation rel, ItemPointer tid, Snapshot snapshot)
 								GetCurrentCommandId(true),
 								snapshot, InvalidSnapshot,
 								true /* wait for commit */ ,
-								&tmfd, false /* changingPart */ );
+								&tmfd, false /* changingPart */ ,
+								false, NULL);
 
 	switch (result)
 	{
@@ -355,7 +356,8 @@ simple_table_tuple_update(Relation rel, ItemPointer otid,
 								GetCurrentCommandId(true),
 								snapshot, InvalidSnapshot,
 								true /* wait for commit */ ,
-								&tmfd, &lockmode, update_indexes);
+								&tmfd, &lockmode, update_indexes,
+								false, NULL);
 
 	switch (result)
 	{
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
index 56398c399c9..1d716e14526 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
@@ -1284,7 +1284,8 @@ ExecDeletePrologue(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
  */
 static TM_Result
 ExecDeleteAct(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
-			  ItemPointer tupleid, bool changingPart)
+			  ItemPointer tupleid, bool changingPart,
+			  bool lockUpdated, TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
 {
 	EState	   *estate = context->estate;
 
@@ -1294,7 +1295,9 @@ ExecDeleteAct(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
 							  estate->es_crosscheck_snapshot,
 							  true /* wait for commit */ ,
 							  &context->tmfd,
-							  changingPart);
+							  changingPart,
+							  lockUpdated,
+							  lockedSlot);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1439,7 +1442,12 @@ ExecDelete(ModifyTableContext *context,
 		 * transaction-snapshot mode transactions.
 		 */
 ldelete:
-		result = ExecDeleteAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, changingPart);
+
+		if (!IsolationUsesXactSnapshot())
+			slot = ExecGetReturningSlot(estate, resultRelInfo);
+
+		result = ExecDeleteAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, changingPart,
+							   !IsolationUsesXactSnapshot(), slot);
 
 		switch (result)
 		{
@@ -1498,81 +1506,28 @@ ldelete:
 					EvalPlanQualBegin(context->epqstate);
 					inputslot = EvalPlanQualSlot(context->epqstate, resultRelationDesc,
 												 resultRelInfo->ri_RangeTableIndex);
+					ExecCopySlot(inputslot, slot);
 
-					result = table_tuple_lock(resultRelationDesc, tupleid,
-											  estate->es_snapshot,
-											  inputslot, estate->es_output_cid,
-											  LockTupleExclusive, LockWaitBlock,
-											  TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION,
-											  &context->tmfd);
+					Assert(context->tmfd.traversed);
+					epqslot = EvalPlanQual(context->epqstate,
+										   resultRelationDesc,
+										   resultRelInfo->ri_RangeTableIndex,
+										   inputslot);
+					if (TupIsNull(epqslot))
+						/* Tuple not passing quals anymore, exiting... */
+						return NULL;
 
-					switch (result)
+					/*
+					 * If requested, skip delete and pass back the updated
+					 * row.
+					 */
+					if (epqreturnslot)
 					{
-						case TM_Ok:
-							Assert(context->tmfd.traversed);
-							epqslot = EvalPlanQual(context->epqstate,
-												   resultRelationDesc,
-												   resultRelInfo->ri_RangeTableIndex,
-												   inputslot);
-							if (TupIsNull(epqslot))
-								/* Tuple not passing quals anymore, exiting... */
-								return NULL;
-
-							/*
-							 * If requested, skip delete and pass back the
-							 * updated row.
-							 */
-							if (epqreturnslot)
-							{
-								*epqreturnslot = epqslot;
-								return NULL;
-							}
-							else
-								goto ldelete;
-
-						case TM_SelfModified:
-
-							/*
-							 * This can be reached when following an update
-							 * chain from a tuple updated by another session,
-							 * reaching a tuple that was already updated in
-							 * this transaction. If previously updated by this
-							 * command, ignore the delete, otherwise error
-							 * out.
-							 *
-							 * See also TM_SelfModified response to
-							 * table_tuple_delete() above.
-							 */
-							if (context->tmfd.cmax != estate->es_output_cid)
-								ereport(ERROR,
-										(errcode(ERRCODE_TRIGGERED_DATA_CHANGE_VIOLATION),
-										 errmsg("tuple to be deleted was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command"),
-										 errhint("Consider using an AFTER trigger instead of a BEFORE trigger to propagate changes to other rows.")));
-							return NULL;
-
-						case TM_Deleted:
-							/* tuple already deleted; nothing to do */
-							return NULL;
-
-						default:
-
-							/*
-							 * TM_Invisible should be impossible because we're
-							 * waiting for updated row versions, and would
-							 * already have errored out if the first version
-							 * is invisible.
-							 *
-							 * TM_Updated should be impossible, because we're
-							 * locking the latest version via
-							 * TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION.
-							 */
-							elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_tuple_lock status: %u",
-								 result);
-							return NULL;
+						*epqreturnslot = epqslot;
+						return NULL;
 					}
-
-					Assert(false);
-					break;
+					else
+						goto ldelete;
 				}
 
 			case TM_Deleted:
@@ -1629,7 +1584,7 @@ ldelete:
 			{
 				ExecForceStoreHeapTuple(oldtuple, slot, false);
 			}
-			else
+			else if (TupIsNull(slot))
 			{
 				if (!table_tuple_fetch_row_version(resultRelationDesc, tupleid,
 												   SnapshotAny, slot))
@@ -1904,7 +1859,8 @@ ExecUpdatePrepareSlot(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
 static TM_Result
 ExecUpdateAct(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
 			  ItemPointer tupleid, HeapTuple oldtuple, TupleTableSlot *slot,
-			  bool canSetTag, UpdateContext *updateCxt)
+			  bool canSetTag, UpdateContext *updateCxt, bool lockUpdated,
+			  TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
 {
 	EState	   *estate = context->estate;
 	Relation	resultRelationDesc = resultRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
@@ -2038,7 +1994,8 @@ lreplace:
 								estate->es_crosscheck_snapshot,
 								true /* wait for commit */ ,
 								&context->tmfd, &updateCxt->lockmode,
-								&updateCxt->updateIndexes);
+								&updateCxt->updateIndexes,
+								lockUpdated, lockedSlot);
 	if (result == TM_Ok)
 		updateCxt->updated = true;
 
@@ -2189,7 +2146,7 @@ ExecCrossPartitionUpdateForeignKey(ModifyTableContext *context,
 static TupleTableSlot *
 ExecUpdate(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
 		   ItemPointer tupleid, HeapTuple oldtuple, TupleTableSlot *slot,
-		   bool canSetTag)
+		   bool canSetTag, bool locked)
 {
 	EState	   *estate = context->estate;
 	Relation	resultRelationDesc = resultRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
@@ -2242,12 +2199,32 @@ ExecUpdate(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
 	}
 	else
 	{
+		TupleTableSlot *oldSlot;
+		bool		lockUpdated;
+
 		/* Fill in the slot appropriately */
 		ExecUpdatePrepareSlot(resultRelInfo, slot, estate);
 
 redo_act:
+		if (!IsolationUsesXactSnapshot() && !locked)
+		{
+			/* Make sure ri_oldTupleSlot is initialized. */
+			if (unlikely(!resultRelInfo->ri_projectNewInfoValid))
+				ExecInitUpdateProjection(context->mtstate,
+										 resultRelInfo);
+
+			/* Fetch the most recent version of old tuple. */
+			lockUpdated = true;
+			oldSlot = resultRelInfo->ri_oldTupleSlot;
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			lockUpdated = false;
+			oldSlot = NULL;
+		}
+
 		result = ExecUpdateAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, slot,
-							   canSetTag, &updateCxt);
+							   canSetTag, &updateCxt, lockUpdated, oldSlot);
 
 		/*
 		 * If ExecUpdateAct reports that a cross-partition update was done,
@@ -2300,12 +2277,12 @@ redo_act:
 				{
 					TupleTableSlot *inputslot;
 					TupleTableSlot *epqslot;
-					TupleTableSlot *oldSlot;
 
 					if (IsolationUsesXactSnapshot())
 						ereport(ERROR,
 								(errcode(ERRCODE_T_R_SERIALIZATION_FAILURE),
 								 errmsg("could not serialize access due to concurrent update")));
+					Assert(!locked);
 
 					/*
 					 * Already know that we're going to need to do EPQ, so
@@ -2313,73 +2290,19 @@ redo_act:
 					 */
 					inputslot = EvalPlanQualSlot(context->epqstate, resultRelationDesc,
 												 resultRelInfo->ri_RangeTableIndex);
-
-					result = table_tuple_lock(resultRelationDesc, tupleid,
-											  estate->es_snapshot,
-											  inputslot, estate->es_output_cid,
-											  updateCxt.lockmode, LockWaitBlock,
-											  TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION,
-											  &context->tmfd);
-
-					switch (result)
-					{
-						case TM_Ok:
-							Assert(context->tmfd.traversed);
-
-							epqslot = EvalPlanQual(context->epqstate,
-												   resultRelationDesc,
-												   resultRelInfo->ri_RangeTableIndex,
-												   inputslot);
-							if (TupIsNull(epqslot))
-								/* Tuple not passing quals anymore, exiting... */
-								return NULL;
-
-							/* Make sure ri_oldTupleSlot is initialized. */
-							if (unlikely(!resultRelInfo->ri_projectNewInfoValid))
-								ExecInitUpdateProjection(context->mtstate,
-														 resultRelInfo);
-
-							/* Fetch the most recent version of old tuple. */
-							oldSlot = resultRelInfo->ri_oldTupleSlot;
-							if (!table_tuple_fetch_row_version(resultRelationDesc,
-															   tupleid,
-															   SnapshotAny,
-															   oldSlot))
-								elog(ERROR, "failed to fetch tuple being updated");
-							slot = ExecGetUpdateNewTuple(resultRelInfo,
-														 epqslot, oldSlot);
-							goto redo_act;
-
-						case TM_Deleted:
-							/* tuple already deleted; nothing to do */
-							return NULL;
-
-						case TM_SelfModified:
-
-							/*
-							 * This can be reached when following an update
-							 * chain from a tuple updated by another session,
-							 * reaching a tuple that was already updated in
-							 * this transaction. If previously modified by
-							 * this command, ignore the redundant update,
-							 * otherwise error out.
-							 *
-							 * See also TM_SelfModified response to
-							 * table_tuple_update() above.
-							 */
-							if (context->tmfd.cmax != estate->es_output_cid)
-								ereport(ERROR,
-										(errcode(ERRCODE_TRIGGERED_DATA_CHANGE_VIOLATION),
-										 errmsg("tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command"),
-										 errhint("Consider using an AFTER trigger instead of a BEFORE trigger to propagate changes to other rows.")));
-							return NULL;
-
-						default:
-							/* see table_tuple_lock call in ExecDelete() */
-							elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_tuple_lock status: %u",
-								 result);
-							return NULL;
-					}
+					ExecCopySlot(inputslot, oldSlot);
+					Assert(context->tmfd.traversed);
+
+					epqslot = EvalPlanQual(context->epqstate,
+										   resultRelationDesc,
+										   resultRelInfo->ri_RangeTableIndex,
+										   inputslot);
+					if (TupIsNull(epqslot))
+						/* Tuple not passing quals anymore, exiting... */
+						return NULL;
+					slot = ExecGetUpdateNewTuple(resultRelInfo,
+												 epqslot, oldSlot);
+					goto redo_act;
 				}
 
 				break;
@@ -2623,7 +2546,7 @@ ExecOnConflictUpdate(ModifyTableContext *context,
 	*returning = ExecUpdate(context, resultRelInfo,
 							conflictTid, NULL,
 							resultRelInfo->ri_onConflict->oc_ProjSlot,
-							canSetTag);
+							canSetTag, true);
 
 	/*
 	 * Clear out existing tuple, as there might not be another conflict among
@@ -2830,7 +2753,8 @@ lmerge_matched:
 				}
 				ExecUpdatePrepareSlot(resultRelInfo, newslot, context->estate);
 				result = ExecUpdateAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, NULL,
-									   newslot, mtstate->canSetTag, &updateCxt);
+									   newslot, mtstate->canSetTag, &updateCxt,
+									   false, NULL);
 				if (result == TM_Ok && updateCxt.updated)
 				{
 					ExecUpdateEpilogue(context, &updateCxt, resultRelInfo,
@@ -2848,7 +2772,8 @@ lmerge_matched:
 					result = TM_Ok;
 					break;
 				}
-				result = ExecDeleteAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, false);
+				result = ExecDeleteAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, false,
+									   false, NULL);
 				if (result == TM_Ok)
 				{
 					ExecDeleteEpilogue(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, NULL,
@@ -3796,7 +3721,7 @@ ExecModifyTable(PlanState *pstate)
 
 				/* Now apply the update. */
 				slot = ExecUpdate(&context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple,
-								  slot, node->canSetTag);
+								  slot, node->canSetTag, false);
 				break;
 
 			case CMD_DELETE:
diff --git a/src/include/access/tableam.h b/src/include/access/tableam.h
index 3fb184717f6..e9a4add3a91 100644
--- a/src/include/access/tableam.h
+++ b/src/include/access/tableam.h
@@ -514,7 +514,9 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
 								 Snapshot crosscheck,
 								 bool wait,
 								 TM_FailureData *tmfd,
-								 bool changingPart);
+								 bool changingPart,
+								 bool lockUpdated,
+								 TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot);
 
 	/* see table_tuple_update() for reference about parameters */
 	TM_Result	(*tuple_update) (Relation rel,
@@ -526,7 +528,9 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
 								 bool wait,
 								 TM_FailureData *tmfd,
 								 LockTupleMode *lockmode,
-								 bool *update_indexes);
+								 bool *update_indexes,
+								 bool lockUpdated,
+								 TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot);
 
 	/* see table_tuple_lock() for reference about parameters */
 	TM_Result	(*tuple_lock) (Relation rel,
@@ -1461,11 +1465,13 @@ table_multi_insert(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot **slots, int nslots,
 static inline TM_Result
 table_tuple_delete(Relation rel, ItemPointer tid, CommandId cid,
 				   Snapshot snapshot, Snapshot crosscheck, bool wait,
-				   TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool changingPart)
+				   TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool changingPart,
+				   bool lockUpdated, TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
 {
 	return rel->rd_tableam->tuple_delete(rel, tid, cid,
 										 snapshot, crosscheck,
-										 wait, tmfd, changingPart);
+										 wait, tmfd, changingPart,
+										 lockUpdated, lockedSlot);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1506,12 +1512,14 @@ static inline TM_Result
 table_tuple_update(Relation rel, ItemPointer otid, TupleTableSlot *slot,
 				   CommandId cid, Snapshot snapshot, Snapshot crosscheck,
 				   bool wait, TM_FailureData *tmfd, LockTupleMode *lockmode,
-				   bool *update_indexes)
+				   bool *update_indexes, bool lockUpdated,
+				   TupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
 {
 	return rel->rd_tableam->tuple_update(rel, otid, slot,
 										 cid, snapshot, crosscheck,
 										 wait, tmfd,
-										 lockmode, update_indexes);
+										 lockmode, update_indexes,
+										 lockUpdated, lockedSlot);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)