REL_14-v2-0001-Make-the-decoded-transaction-as-subxact-while-dec.patch
application/octet-stream
Filename: REL_14-v2-0001-Make-the-decoded-transaction-as-subxact-while-dec.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Part: 2
Patch
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/attachments/:id/patch
the parsed metadata as JSON — format, series position, per-file stats; never the diff bytes.
API reference →
Format: format-patch
Series: patch v2-0001
Subject: Make the decoded transaction as subxact while decoding COMMIT record
| File | + | − |
|---|---|---|
| contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out | 43 | 1 |
| contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec | 14 | 0 |
| src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c | 34 | 3 |
| src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 1 | 1 |
| src/include/replication/reorderbuffer.h | 1 | 0 |
From a8ba66a6a9030bacab0b4289691127450b61ee49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:25:30 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v2] Make the decoded transaction as subxact while decoding
COMMIT record
Since ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChanges() generates ReorderBufferTXNs as
top-level ones, it was possible that two transactions were decoded as top-level
by the same COMMIT record.
This commit adds ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChangesEx(), which can control
whether to create a decoded transaction as a top. The function is used when the
COMMIT is decoded and the record is marked as XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS.
Author: Haiyang Li, Hayato Kuroda
Reported-by: Haiyang Li
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Li, Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18369-ad61699bf91c5bc0%40postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
---
.../expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out | 44 ++++++++++++++++++-
.../specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec | 14 ++++++
.../replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c | 37 ++++++++++++++--
src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 2 +-
src/include/replication/reorderbuffer.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out b/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out
index 551dc2204a..31ef2f64e8 100644
--- a/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out
+++ b/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Parsed test spec with 2 sessions
+Parsed test spec with 3 sessions
starting permutation: s0_init s0_begin s0_savepoint s0_truncate s1_checkpoint s1_get_changes s0_commit s0_begin s0_insert s1_checkpoint s1_get_changes s0_commit s1_get_changes
step s0_init: SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('isolation_slot', 'test_decoding');
@@ -176,3 +176,45 @@ COMMIT
stop
(1 row)
+
+starting permutation: s0_init s0_begin s0_savepoint s0_create_part1 s0_savepoint_release s2_init s1_checkpoint s1_get_changes s0_commit s2_get_changes s2_stop
+step s0_init: SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('isolation_slot', 'test_decoding');
+?column?
+--------
+init
+(1 row)
+
+step s0_begin: BEGIN;
+step s0_savepoint: SAVEPOINT sp1;
+step s0_create_part1: CREATE TABLE tbl1_part_p1 PARTITION OF tbl1_part FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (10);
+step s0_savepoint_release: RELEASE SAVEPOINT sp1;
+step s2_init: SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('another_slot', 'test_decoding'); <waiting ...>
+step s1_checkpoint: CHECKPOINT;
+step s1_get_changes: SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('isolation_slot', NULL, NULL, 'skip-empty-xacts', '1', 'include-xids', '0');
+data
+----
+(0 rows)
+
+step s0_commit: COMMIT;
+step s2_init: <... completed>
+?column?
+--------
+init
+(1 row)
+
+step s2_get_changes: SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('another_slot', NULL, NULL, 'skip-empty-xacts', '1', 'include-xids', '0');
+data
+----
+(0 rows)
+
+step s2_stop: SELECT 'stop' FROM pg_drop_replication_slot('another_slot');
+?column?
+--------
+stop
+(1 row)
+
+?column?
+--------
+stop
+(1 row)
+
diff --git a/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec b/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec
index d8b9df97ed..986e652a73 100644
--- a/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec
+++ b/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec
@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ setup { SET synchronous_commit=on; }
step "s1_checkpoint" { CHECKPOINT; }
step "s1_get_changes" { SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('isolation_slot', NULL, NULL, 'skip-empty-xacts', '1', 'include-xids', '0'); }
+session "s2"
+setup { SET synchronous_commit=on; }
+step "s2_init" { SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('another_slot', 'test_decoding'); }
+step "s2_get_changes" { SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('another_slot', NULL, NULL, 'skip-empty-xacts', '1', 'include-xids', '0'); }
+step "s2_stop" { SELECT 'stop' FROM pg_drop_replication_slot('another_slot'); }
+
# For the transaction that TRUNCATEd the table tbl1, the last decoding decodes
# only its COMMIT record, because it starts from the RUNNING_XACTS record emitted
# during the first checkpoint execution. This transaction must be marked as
@@ -75,3 +81,11 @@ permutation "s0_init" "s0_begin" "s0_savepoint" "s0_insert" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_
# that the corresponding substransaction is also marked as containing a catalog
# modifying change.
permutation "s0_init" "s0_begin" "s0_savepoint" "s0_create_part1" "s0_savepoint_release" "s1_checkpoint" "s0_create_part2" "s0_commit" "s0_begin" "s0_truncate" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_get_changes" "s0_insert_part" "s1_get_changes" "s0_commit" "s1_get_changes"
+
+# The last decoding restarts from the slot creation by session 2 and doesn't
+# decode any WAL records generated by the subtransaction that performed
+# s0_create_part1. While processing the commit record for the corresponding
+# top-level transaction which will be marked as containing catalog change, we
+# ensure that the corresponding substransaction is added into ReorderBuffer as
+# subxact.
+permutation "s0_init" "s0_begin" "s0_savepoint" "s0_create_part1" "s0_savepoint_release" "s2_init" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_get_changes" "s0_commit" "s2_get_changes" "s2_stop"
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c
index 264c253a87..d140178744 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c
@@ -1059,8 +1059,14 @@ ReorderBufferAssignChild(ReorderBuffer *rb, TransactionId xid,
* We already saw this transaction, but initially added it to the
* list of top-level txns. Now that we know it's not top-level,
* remove it from there.
+ *
+ * Note: There is a possibility that the transaction was created
+ * as not the top-level txn, but the flag was not set. In this
+ * case, the transaction was not added to the list. This happens if
+ * sub-txns are first recognized and decoded by a COMMIT record.
*/
- dlist_delete(&subtxn->node);
+ if (subtxn->node.next != NULL)
+ dlist_delete(&subtxn->node);
}
}
@@ -1543,14 +1549,15 @@ ReorderBufferCleanupTXN(ReorderBuffer *rb, ReorderBufferTXN *txn)
}
/*
- * Remove TXN from its containing list.
+ * Remove TXN from its containing list if registered.
*
* Note: if txn is known as subxact, we are deleting the TXN from its
* parent's list of known subxacts; this leaves the parent's nsubxacts
* count too high, but we don't care. Otherwise, we are deleting the TXN
* from the LSN-ordered list of toplevel TXNs.
*/
- dlist_delete(&txn->node);
+ if (txn->node.next != NULL)
+ dlist_delete(&txn->node);
/* now remove reference from buffer */
hash_search(rb->by_txn,
@@ -3315,6 +3322,30 @@ ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChanges(ReorderBuffer *rb, TransactionId xid,
txn->toptxn->txn_flags |= RBTXN_HAS_CATALOG_CHANGES;
}
+/*
+ * Most of parts same as ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChanges(), but can control
+ * whether the ReorderBufferTXN is created as top transaction or not.
+ */
+void
+ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChangesEx(ReorderBuffer *rb, TransactionId xid,
+ XLogRecPtr lsn, bool is_top)
+{
+ ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
+
+ txn = ReorderBufferTXNByXid(rb, xid, true, NULL, lsn, is_top);
+
+ txn->txn_flags |= RBTXN_HAS_CATALOG_CHANGES;
+
+ /*
+ * Mark top-level transaction as having catalog changes too if one of its
+ * children has so that the ReorderBufferBuildTupleCidHash can
+ * conveniently check just top-level transaction and decide whether to
+ * build the hash table or not.
+ */
+ if (txn->toptxn != NULL)
+ txn->toptxn->txn_flags |= RBTXN_HAS_CATALOG_CHANGES;
+}
+
/*
* Query whether a transaction is already *known* to contain catalog
* changes. This can be wrong until directly before the commit!
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index 4f8c00f717..5ce1e034f7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -2134,6 +2134,6 @@ SnapBuildXidSetCatalogChanges(SnapBuild *builder, TransactionId xid, int subxcnt
ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChanges(builder->reorder, xid, lsn);
for (int i = 0; i < subxcnt; i++)
- ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChanges(builder->reorder, subxacts[i], lsn);
+ ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChangesEx(builder->reorder, subxacts[i], lsn, false);
}
}
diff --git a/src/include/replication/reorderbuffer.h b/src/include/replication/reorderbuffer.h
index ba257d81b5..53c24086d0 100644
--- a/src/include/replication/reorderbuffer.h
+++ b/src/include/replication/reorderbuffer.h
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ void ReorderBufferImmediateInvalidation(ReorderBuffer *, uint32 ninvalidations,
void ReorderBufferProcessXid(ReorderBuffer *, TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr lsn);
void ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChanges(ReorderBuffer *, TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr lsn);
+void ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChangesEx(ReorderBuffer *, TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr lsn, bool is_top);
bool ReorderBufferXidHasCatalogChanges(ReorderBuffer *, TransactionId xid);
bool ReorderBufferXidHasBaseSnapshot(ReorderBuffer *, TransactionId xid);
--
2.43.0