ts-typanalyze-fix-2.patch
text/x-patch
Filename: ts-typanalyze-fix-2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Part: 0
Patch
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/attachments/:id/patch
the parsed metadata as JSON — format, series position, per-file stats; never the diff bytes.
API reference →
Format: context
| File | + | − |
|---|---|---|
| ts_typanalyze.c | 96 | 44 |
Index: ts_typanalyze.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/tsearch/ts_typanalyze.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -c -r1.8 ts_typanalyze.c
*** ts_typanalyze.c 2 Jan 2010 16:57:53 -0000 1.8
--- ts_typanalyze.c 30 May 2010 21:42:30 -0000
***************
*** 92,112 ****
* http://www.vldb.org/conf/2002/S10P03.pdf
*
* The Lossy Counting (aka LC) algorithm goes like this:
! * Let D be a set of triples (e, f, d), where e is an element value, f is
! * that element's frequency (occurrence count) and d is the maximum error in
! * f. We start with D empty and process the elements in batches of size
! * w. (The batch size is also known as "bucket size".) Let the current batch
! * number be b_current, starting with 1. For each element e we either
! * increment its f count, if it's already in D, or insert a new triple into D
! * with values (e, 1, b_current - 1). After processing each batch we prune D,
! * by removing from it all elements with f + d <= b_current. Finally, we
! * gather elements with largest f. The LC paper proves error bounds on f
! * dependent on the batch size w, and shows that the required table size
! * is no more than a few times w.
*
! * We use a hashtable for the D structure and a bucket width of
! * statistics_target * 10, where 10 is an arbitrarily chosen constant,
! * meant to approximate the number of lexemes in a single tsvector.
*/
static void
compute_tsvector_stats(VacAttrStats *stats,
--- 92,140 ----
* http://www.vldb.org/conf/2002/S10P03.pdf
*
* The Lossy Counting (aka LC) algorithm goes like this:
! * Let s be the threshold frequency for an item (the minimum frequency we
! * are interested in) and epsilon the error margin for the frequency. Let D
! * be a set of triples (e, f, delta), where e is an element value, f is that
! * element's frequency (actually, its current occurrence count) and delta is
! * the maximum error in f. We start with D empty and process the elements in
! * batches of size w. (The batch size is also known as "bucket size" and is
! * equal to 1/epsilon.) Let the current batch number be b_current, starting
! * with 1. For each element e we either increment its f count, if it's
! * already in D, or insert a new triple into D with values (e, 1, b_current
! * - 1). After processing each batch we prune D, by removing from it all
! * elements with f + delta <= b_current. After the algorithm finishes we
! * suppress all elements from D that do not satisfy f >= (s - epsilon) * N,
! * where N is the total number of elements in the input. We emit the
! * remaining elements with estimated frequency f/N. The LC paper proves
! * that this algorithm finds all elements with true frequency at least s,
! * and that no frequency is overestimated or is underestimated by more than
! * epsilon. Furthermore, given reasonable assumptions about the input
! * distribution, the required table size is no more than about 7 times w.
*
! * We set s to be the estimated frequency of the K'th word in a natural
! * language's frequency table, where K is the target number of entries in
! * the MCELEM array plus an arbitrary constant, meant to reflect the fact
! * that the most common words in any language would usually be stopwords
! * so we will not actually see them in the input. We assume that the
! * distribution of word frequencies (including the stopwords) follows Zipf's
! * law with an exponent of 1.
! *
! * Assuming Zipfian distribution, the frequency of the K'th word is equal
! * to 1/(K * H(W)) where H(n) is 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/n and W is the number of
! * words in the language. Putting W as one million, we get roughly 0.07/K.
! * Assuming top 10 words are stopwords gives s = 0.07/(K + 10). We set
! * epsilon = s/10, which gives bucket width w = (K + 10)/0.007 and
! * maximum expected hashtable size of about 1000 * (K + 10).
! *
! * Note: in the above discussion, s, epsilon, and f/N are in terms of a
! * lexeme's frequency as a fraction of all lexemes seen in the input.
! * However, what we actually want to store in the finished pg_statistic
! * entry is each lexeme's frequency as a fraction of all rows that it occurs
! * in. Assuming that the input tsvectors are correctly constructed, no
! * lexeme occurs more than once per tsvector, so the final count f is a
! * correct estimate of the number of input tsvectors it occurs in, and we
! * need only change the divisor from N to nonnull_cnt to get the number we
! * want.
*/
static void
compute_tsvector_stats(VacAttrStats *stats,
***************
*** 133,151 ****
LexemeHashKey hash_key;
TrackItem *item;
! /* We want statistics_target * 10 lexemes in the MCELEM array */
num_mcelem = stats->attr->attstattarget * 10;
/*
! * We set bucket width equal to the target number of result lexemes. This
! * is probably about right but perhaps might need to be scaled up or down
! * a bit?
*/
! bucket_width = num_mcelem;
/*
* Create the hashtable. It will be in local memory, so we don't need to
! * worry about initial size too much. Also we don't need to pay any
* attention to locking and memory management.
*/
MemSet(&hash_ctl, 0, sizeof(hash_ctl));
--- 161,183 ----
LexemeHashKey hash_key;
TrackItem *item;
! /*
! * We want statistics_target * 10 lexemes in the MCELEM array. This
! * multiplier is pretty arbitrary, but is meant to reflect the fact that
! * the number of individual lexeme values tracked in pg_statistic ought
! * to be more than the number of values for a simple scalar column.
! */
num_mcelem = stats->attr->attstattarget * 10;
/*
! * We set bucket width equal to (num_mcelem + 10) / 0.007 as per the
! * comment above.
*/
! bucket_width = (num_mcelem + 10) * 1000 / 7;
/*
* Create the hashtable. It will be in local memory, so we don't need to
! * worry about overflowing the initial size. Also we don't need to pay any
* attention to locking and memory management.
*/
MemSet(&hash_ctl, 0, sizeof(hash_ctl));
***************
*** 155,167 ****
hash_ctl.match = lexeme_match;
hash_ctl.hcxt = CurrentMemoryContext;
lexemes_tab = hash_create("Analyzed lexemes table",
! bucket_width * 4,
&hash_ctl,
HASH_ELEM | HASH_FUNCTION | HASH_COMPARE | HASH_CONTEXT);
/* Initialize counters. */
b_current = 1;
! lexeme_no = 1;
/* Loop over the tsvectors. */
for (vector_no = 0; vector_no < samplerows; vector_no++)
--- 187,199 ----
hash_ctl.match = lexeme_match;
hash_ctl.hcxt = CurrentMemoryContext;
lexemes_tab = hash_create("Analyzed lexemes table",
! bucket_width * 7,
&hash_ctl,
HASH_ELEM | HASH_FUNCTION | HASH_COMPARE | HASH_CONTEXT);
/* Initialize counters. */
b_current = 1;
! lexeme_no = 0;
/* Loop over the tsvectors. */
for (vector_no = 0; vector_no < samplerows; vector_no++)
***************
*** 232,237 ****
--- 264,272 ----
item->delta = b_current - 1;
}
+ /* lexeme_no is the number of elements processed (ie N) */
+ lexeme_no++;
+
/* We prune the D structure after processing each bucket */
if (lexeme_no % bucket_width == 0)
{
***************
*** 240,246 ****
}
/* Advance to the next WordEntry in the tsvector */
- lexeme_no++;
curentryptr++;
}
}
--- 275,280 ----
***************
*** 252,257 ****
--- 286,292 ----
int i;
TrackItem **sort_table;
int track_len;
+ int cutoff_freq;
int minfreq,
maxfreq;
***************
*** 264,297 ****
stats->stadistinct = -1.0;
/*
! * Determine the top-N lexemes by simply copying pointers from the
! * hashtable into an array and applying qsort()
*/
! track_len = hash_get_num_entries(lexemes_tab);
! sort_table = (TrackItem **) palloc(sizeof(TrackItem *) * track_len);
hash_seq_init(&scan_status, lexemes_tab);
! i = 0;
while ((item = (TrackItem *) hash_seq_search(&scan_status)) != NULL)
{
! sort_table[i++] = item;
}
! Assert(i == track_len);
! qsort(sort_table, track_len, sizeof(TrackItem *),
! trackitem_compare_frequencies_desc);
! /* Suppress any single-occurrence items */
! while (track_len > 0)
{
! if (sort_table[track_len - 1]->frequency > 1)
! break;
! track_len--;
}
!
! /* Determine the number of most common lexemes to be stored */
! if (num_mcelem > track_len)
num_mcelem = track_len;
/* Generate MCELEM slot entry */
--- 299,349 ----
stats->stadistinct = -1.0;
/*
! * Construct an array of the interesting hashtable items, that is,
! * those meeting the cutoff frequency (s - epsilon)*N. Also identify
! * the minimum and maximum frequencies among these items.
! *
! * Since epsilon = s/10 and bucket_width = 1/epsilon, the cutoff
! * frequency is 9*N / bucket_width.
*/
! cutoff_freq = 9 * lexeme_no / bucket_width;
! i = hash_get_num_entries(lexemes_tab); /* surely enough space */
! sort_table = (TrackItem **) palloc(sizeof(TrackItem *) * i);
hash_seq_init(&scan_status, lexemes_tab);
! track_len = 0;
! minfreq = lexeme_no;
! maxfreq = 0;
while ((item = (TrackItem *) hash_seq_search(&scan_status)) != NULL)
{
! if (item->frequency > cutoff_freq)
! {
! sort_table[track_len++] = item;
! minfreq = Min(minfreq, item->frequency);
! maxfreq = Max(maxfreq, item->frequency);
! }
}
! Assert(track_len <= i);
! /* emit some statistics for debug purposes */
! elog(DEBUG3, "tsvector_stats: target # mces = %d, bucket width = %d, "
! "# lexemes = %d, hashtable size = %d, usable entries = %d",
! num_mcelem, bucket_width, lexeme_no, i, track_len);
! /*
! * If we obtained more lexemes than we really want, get rid of
! * those with least frequencies. The easiest way is to qsort the
! * array into descending frequency order and truncate the array.
! */
! if (num_mcelem < track_len)
{
! qsort(sort_table, track_len, sizeof(TrackItem *),
! trackitem_compare_frequencies_desc);
! /* reset minfreq to the smallest frequency we're keeping */
! minfreq = sort_table[num_mcelem - 1]->frequency;
}
! else
num_mcelem = track_len;
/* Generate MCELEM slot entry */
***************
*** 301,310 ****
Datum *mcelem_values;
float4 *mcelem_freqs;
- /* Grab the minimal and maximal frequencies that will get stored */
- minfreq = sort_table[num_mcelem - 1]->frequency;
- maxfreq = sort_table[0]->frequency;
-
/*
* We want to store statistics sorted on the lexeme value using
* first length, then byte-for-byte comparison. The reason for
--- 353,358 ----
***************
*** 334,339 ****
--- 382,391 ----
mcelem_values = (Datum *) palloc(num_mcelem * sizeof(Datum));
mcelem_freqs = (float4 *) palloc((num_mcelem + 2) * sizeof(float4));
+ /*
+ * See comments above about use of nonnull_cnt as the divisor
+ * for the final frequency estimates.
+ */
for (i = 0; i < num_mcelem; i++)
{
TrackItem *item = sort_table[i];