v19-0002-Restrict-conflicting-EXCEPT-lists-in-multi-schem.patch

application/octet-stream

Filename: v19-0002-Restrict-conflicting-EXCEPT-lists-in-multi-schem.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Part: 1
Message: Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications

Patch

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/attachments/:id/patch the parsed metadata as JSON — format, series position, per-file stats; never the diff bytes. API reference →
Format: format-patch
Series: patch v19-0002
Subject: Restrict conflicting EXCEPT lists in multi-schema publications
File+
src/backend/commands/publicationcmds.c 140 31
src/backend/parser/gram.y 3 32
src/test/regress/expected/publication.out 61 0
src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql 44 0
From 941c3a44ead8c0046ab17745646d448b128d3f4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 15:07:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v19 2/5] Restrict conflicting EXCEPT lists in multi-schema
 publications

Add ProcessSchemaExceptTables() to qualify each mention's EXCEPT
entries, build a sorted signature per schema OID, and compare it
against any prior mention of the same schema in the same statement,
erroring on a mismatch.
---
 src/backend/commands/publicationcmds.c    | 171 ++++++++++++++++++----
 src/backend/parser/gram.y                 |  35 +----
 src/test/regress/expected/publication.out |  61 ++++++++
 src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql      |  44 ++++++
 4 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/commands/publicationcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/publicationcmds.c
index 226ddafda93..4289b6bd802 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/publicationcmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/publicationcmds.c
@@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ typedef struct rf_context
 	Oid			parentid;		/* relid of the parent relation */
 } rf_context;
 
+/*
+ * Records the EXCEPT-table signature already seen for a schema mentioned in
+ * a TABLES IN SCHEMA / TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA list, so that a later
+ * mention of the same schema OID can be checked for consistency.  See
+ * ProcessSchemaExceptTables().
+ */
+typedef struct SchemaExceptSig
+{
+	Oid			schemaid;
+	List	   *sig;			/* sorted list of qualified-name strings */
+} SchemaExceptSig;
+
 static List *OpenTableList(List *tables);
 static void CloseTableList(List *rels);
 static void LockSchemaList(List *schemalist);
@@ -73,6 +85,10 @@ static void PublicationAddSchemas(Oid pubid, List *schemas, bool if_not_exists,
 static void PublicationDropSchemas(Oid pubid, List *schemas, bool missing_ok);
 static char defGetGeneratedColsOption(DefElem *def);
 static void CheckExceptNotInTableList(List *except_rels, List *explicitrelids);
+static void ProcessSchemaExceptTables(Oid schemaid, const char *schema_name,
+									  List *except_tables, ParseState *pstate,
+									  List **schema_except_seen,
+									  List **except_pubtables);
 
 
 static void
@@ -177,6 +193,119 @@ parse_publication_options(ParseState *pstate,
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * list_sort() comparator for ProcessSchemaExceptTables()'s signature lists.
+ */
+static int
+pub_except_sig_cmp(const ListCell *a, const ListCell *b)
+{
+	return strcmp((const char *) lfirst(a), (const char *) lfirst(b));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns true if the two (already-sorted) EXCEPT-table signature lists
+ * built by ProcessSchemaExceptTables() are identical.
+ */
+static bool
+pub_except_sig_equal(List *sig1, List *sig2)
+{
+	ListCell   *lc1;
+	ListCell   *lc2;
+
+	if (list_length(sig1) != list_length(sig2))
+		return false;
+
+	forboth(lc1, sig1, lc2, sig2)
+	{
+		if (strcmp((const char *) lfirst(lc1), (const char *) lfirst(lc2)) != 0)
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Qualify unqualified EXCEPT table names with schema_name, reject entries
+ * explicitly qualified with a different schema, and append the (now
+ * qualified) tables to *except_pubtables.
+ *
+ * Also detects the case where schemaid was already mentioned earlier in the
+ * same TABLES IN SCHEMA list with a different EXCEPT list: since each
+ * mention flattens its except_tables independently, without this check two
+ * (or more) mentions of the same schema with differing EXCEPT lists would
+ * silently union together instead of being rejected as contradictory.
+ * *schema_except_seen accumulates the signature (sorted list of qualified
+ * relation names) seen so far for each schema OID in this statement.
+ */
+static void
+ProcessSchemaExceptTables(Oid schemaid, const char *schema_name,
+						  List *except_tables, ParseState *pstate,
+						  List **schema_except_seen, List **except_pubtables)
+{
+	List	   *sig = NIL;
+	SchemaExceptSig *seen = NULL;
+
+	foreach_ptr(PublicationObjSpec, eobj, except_tables)
+	{
+		const char *eobj_schemaname = eobj->pubtable->relation->schemaname;
+		const char *eobj_relname = eobj->pubtable->relation->relname;
+
+		if (eobj_schemaname == NULL)
+			eobj->pubtable->relation->schemaname = pstrdup(schema_name);
+		else if (strcmp(eobj_schemaname, schema_name) != 0)
+			ereport(ERROR,
+					errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
+					errmsg("table \"%s\" in EXCEPT clause does not belong to schema \"%s\"",
+						   quote_qualified_identifier(eobj_schemaname, eobj_relname),
+						   schema_name),
+					parser_errposition(pstate, eobj->location));
+
+		/*
+		 * Include the ONLY-ness of this entry in its signature. EXCEPT
+		 * (TABLE parent) excludes parent and its inheritance children,
+		 * while EXCEPT (TABLE ONLY parent) excludes only parent itself.
+		 * These are different exclusion sets, so two mentions of this
+		 * schema that differ only in ONLY must not compare equal below --
+		 * otherwise they'd look like a harmless repeat instead of the
+		 * genuine conflict they are.
+		 */
+		sig = lappend(sig, psprintf("%s%s",
+									eobj->pubtable->relation->inh ? "" : "ONLY ",
+									quote_qualified_identifier(NULL, eobj_relname)));
+	}
+
+	list_sort(sig, pub_except_sig_cmp);
+
+	foreach_ptr(SchemaExceptSig, entry, *schema_except_seen)
+	{
+		if (entry->schemaid == schemaid)
+		{
+			seen = entry;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (seen)
+	{
+		if (!pub_except_sig_equal(seen->sig, sig))
+			ereport(ERROR,
+					errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
+					errmsg("schema \"%s\" specified with conflicting EXCEPT lists",
+						   schema_name));
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		SchemaExceptSig *entry = palloc_object(SchemaExceptSig);
+
+		entry->schemaid = schemaid;
+		entry->sig = sig;
+		*schema_except_seen = lappend(*schema_except_seen, entry);
+	}
+
+	foreach_ptr(PublicationObjSpec, eobj, except_tables)
+		*except_pubtables = lappend(*except_pubtables, eobj->pubtable);
+}
+
 /*
  * Convert the PublicationObjSpecType list into schema oid list and
  * PublicationTable list.
@@ -187,6 +316,7 @@ ObjectsInPublicationToOids(List *pubobjspec_list, ParseState *pstate,
 {
 	ListCell   *cell;
 	PublicationObjSpec *pubobj;
+	List	   *schema_except_seen = NIL;
 
 	if (!pubobjspec_list)
 		return;
@@ -194,6 +324,7 @@ ObjectsInPublicationToOids(List *pubobjspec_list, ParseState *pstate,
 	foreach(cell, pubobjspec_list)
 	{
 		Oid			schemaid;
+		char	   *schema_name;
 		List	   *search_path;
 
 		pubobj = (PublicationObjSpec *) lfirst(cell);
@@ -210,9 +341,14 @@ ObjectsInPublicationToOids(List *pubobjspec_list, ParseState *pstate,
 				break;
 			case PUBLICATIONOBJ_TABLES_IN_SCHEMA:
 				schemaid = get_namespace_oid(pubobj->name, false);
+				schema_name = pubobj->name;
 
 				/* Filter out duplicates if user specifies "sch1, sch1" */
 				*schemas = list_append_unique_oid(*schemas, schemaid);
+
+				ProcessSchemaExceptTables(schemaid, schema_name,
+										  pubobj->except_tables, pstate,
+										  &schema_except_seen, except_pubtables);
 				break;
 			case PUBLICATIONOBJ_TABLES_IN_CUR_SCHEMA:
 				search_path = fetch_search_path(false);
@@ -223,41 +359,14 @@ ObjectsInPublicationToOids(List *pubobjspec_list, ParseState *pstate,
 
 				schemaid = linitial_oid(search_path);
 				list_free(search_path);
+				schema_name = get_namespace_name(schemaid);
 
 				/* Filter out duplicates if user specifies "sch1, sch1" */
 				*schemas = list_append_unique_oid(*schemas, schemaid);
 
-				/*
-				 * Qualify unqualified EXCEPT table names with the resolved
-				 * current schema and reject any explicitly cross-schema
-				 * entries.  This mirrors the parse-time handling done for
-				 * TABLES_IN_SCHEMA in preprocess_pubobj_list(), deferred here
-				 * because CURRENT_SCHEMA is not known until execution time.
-				 */
-				if (pubobj->except_tables != NIL)
-				{
-					char	   *cur_schema_name = get_namespace_name(schemaid);
-
-					foreach_ptr(PublicationObjSpec, eobj, pubobj->except_tables)
-					{
-						const char *eobj_schemaname =
-							eobj->pubtable->relation->schemaname;
-						const char *eobj_relname =
-							eobj->pubtable->relation->relname;
-
-						if (eobj_schemaname == NULL)
-							eobj->pubtable->relation->schemaname = cur_schema_name;
-						else if (strcmp(eobj_schemaname, cur_schema_name) != 0)
-							ereport(ERROR,
-									errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
-									errmsg("table \"%s\" in EXCEPT clause does not belong to schema \"%s\"",
-										   quote_qualified_identifier(eobj_schemaname, eobj_relname),
-										   cur_schema_name));
-
-						*except_pubtables = lappend(*except_pubtables,
-													eobj->pubtable);
-					}
-				}
+				ProcessSchemaExceptTables(schemaid, schema_name,
+										  pubobj->except_tables, pstate,
+										  &schema_except_seen, except_pubtables);
 				break;
 			default:
 				/* shouldn't happen */
diff --git a/src/backend/parser/gram.y b/src/backend/parser/gram.y
index 6a7a1bc5f8d..df1fa3356d9 100644
--- a/src/backend/parser/gram.y
+++ b/src/backend/parser/gram.y
@@ -20789,8 +20789,9 @@ preprocess_pub_all_objtype_list(List *all_objects_list, List **pubobjects,
 /*
  * Process pubobjspec_list to check for errors in any of the objects and
  * convert PUBLICATIONOBJ_CONTINUATION into appropriate PublicationObjSpecType.
- * Also flattens except_tables from TABLES IN SCHEMA nodes into the list so
- * that ObjectsInPublicationToOids() sees them as top-level EXCEPT_TABLE entries.
+ * The except_tables attached to TABLES IN SCHEMA nodes are left in place;
+ * ObjectsInPublicationToOids() qualifies names, validates schema membership,
+ * and flattens them once the schema OID is known.
  */
 static void
 preprocess_pubobj_list(List *pubobjspec_list, core_yyscan_t yyscanner)
@@ -20874,36 +20875,6 @@ preprocess_pubobj_list(List *pubobjspec_list, core_yyscan_t yyscanner)
 						errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
 						errmsg("invalid schema name"),
 						parser_errposition(pubobj->location));
-
-			/*
-			 * For TABLES_IN_SCHEMA, qualify unqualified EXCEPT table names
-			 * with the parent schema and reject cross-schema entries at parse
-			 * time, then flatten into the top-level list.
-			 *
-			 * For TABLES_IN_CUR_SCHEMA the schema name is not yet known, so
-			 * skip both steps here; ObjectsInPublicationToOids() will
-			 * qualify names and validate schema membership at execution time.
-			 */
-			if (pubobj->pubobjtype == PUBLICATIONOBJ_TABLES_IN_SCHEMA)
-			{
-				foreach_ptr(PublicationObjSpec, eobj, pubobj->except_tables)
-				{
-					const char *eobj_schemaname = eobj->pubtable->relation->schemaname;
-					const char *eobj_relname = eobj->pubtable->relation->relname;
-
-					if (eobj_schemaname == NULL)
-						eobj->pubtable->relation->schemaname = pubobj->name;
-					else if (strcmp(eobj_schemaname, pubobj->name) != 0)
-						ereport(ERROR,
-								errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
-								errmsg("table \"%s\" in EXCEPT clause does not belong to schema \"%s\"",
-									   quote_qualified_identifier(eobj_schemaname, eobj_relname),
-									   pubobj->name),
-								parser_errposition(eobj->location));
-				}
-				pubobjspec_list = list_concat(pubobjspec_list, pubobj->except_tables);
-				pubobj->except_tables = NIL;
-			}
 		}
 
 		prevobjtype = pubobj->pubobjtype;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/publication.out b/src/test/regress/expected/publication.out
index 1acdcf44932..1f26cdc2966 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/publication.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/publication.out
@@ -543,6 +543,34 @@ Except tables:
     "pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1"
     "public.testpub_tbl1"
 
+-- Repeating the same schema with an identical EXCEPT list is allowed, same
+-- as repeating a schema with no EXCEPT list at all ("sch1, sch1")
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_samerepeat
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1),
+                  pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1);
+\dRp+ testpub_schema_except_samerepeat
+                                                 Publication testpub_schema_except_samerepeat
+          Owner           | All tables | All sequences | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Generated columns | Via root | Description 
+--------------------------+------------+---------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+-------------------+----------+-------------
+ regress_publication_user | f          | f             | t       | t       | t       | t         | none              | f        | 
+Tables from schemas:
+    "pub_test"
+Except tables:
+    "pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1"
+
+DROP PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_samerepeat;
+-- fail: same schema repeated with conflicting EXCEPT lists
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_conflict
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1),
+                  pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s2);
+ERROR:  schema "pub_test" specified with conflicting EXCEPT lists
+-- fail: same schema repeated where a later mention drops the EXCEPT list
+-- entirely (an empty EXCEPT list still conflicts with a non-empty one)
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_conflict2
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1),
+                  pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s2),
+                  pub_test;
+ERROR:  schema "pub_test" specified with conflicting EXCEPT lists
 -- ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA on a table excluded by a schema publication:
 -- the schema-scoped exclusion is no longer meaningful once the table moves
 -- out of its schema, so the exclusion is auto-removed.
@@ -2111,6 +2139,8 @@ SET search_path = pub_test1;
 -- qualified name from wrong schema -> error
 CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_except FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test2.tbl1);
 ERROR:  table "pub_test2.tbl1" in EXCEPT clause does not belong to schema "pub_test1"
+LINE 1: ...FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test2....
+                                                             ^
 -- unqualified name implicitly qualified with current schema (pub_test1.tbl)
 SET client_min_messages = 'ERROR';
 CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_except FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl);
@@ -2126,6 +2156,37 @@ Except tables:
     "pub_test1.tbl"
 
 DROP PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_except;
+-- CURRENT_SCHEMA and a named schema that resolve to the same OID must be
+-- treated as the same schema for EXCEPT-list consistency checking, just
+-- like two mentions of the same schema name
+-- fail: CURRENT_SCHEMA and pub_test1 (same schema) have conflicting EXCEPT lists
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_named_conflict
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl),
+                  pub_test1 EXCEPT (TABLE tbl1);
+ERROR:  schema "pub_test1" specified with conflicting EXCEPT lists
+-- succeeds: CURRENT_SCHEMA and pub_test1 (same schema) share the same EXCEPT list
+SET client_min_messages = 'ERROR';
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_named_same
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl),
+                  pub_test1 EXCEPT (TABLE tbl);
+RESET client_min_messages;
+\dRp+ testpub_cursch_named_same
+                                                    Publication testpub_cursch_named_same
+          Owner           | All tables | All sequences | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Generated columns | Via root | Description 
+--------------------------+------------+---------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+-------------------+----------+-------------
+ regress_publication_user | f          | f             | t       | t       | t       | t         | none              | f        | 
+Tables from schemas:
+    "pub_test1"
+Except tables:
+    "pub_test1.tbl"
+
+DROP PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_named_same;
+-- fail: two CURRENT_SCHEMA mentions (both resolving to pub_test1) with
+-- conflicting EXCEPT lists
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_cursch_conflict
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl),
+                  CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl1);
+ERROR:  schema "pub_test1" specified with conflicting EXCEPT lists
 RESET search_path;
 -- cleanup pub_test1 schema for invalidation tests
 ALTER PUBLICATION testpub2_forschema DROP TABLES IN SCHEMA pub_test1;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql
index c0d7c2f9d82..97ef5decfb4 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql
@@ -260,6 +260,26 @@ CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_multi
                   public EXCEPT (TABLE testpub_tbl1);
 \dRp+ testpub_schema_except_multi
 
+-- Repeating the same schema with an identical EXCEPT list is allowed, same
+-- as repeating a schema with no EXCEPT list at all ("sch1, sch1")
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_samerepeat
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1),
+                  pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1);
+\dRp+ testpub_schema_except_samerepeat
+DROP PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_samerepeat;
+
+-- fail: same schema repeated with conflicting EXCEPT lists
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_conflict
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1),
+                  pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s2);
+
+-- fail: same schema repeated where a later mention drops the EXCEPT list
+-- entirely (an empty EXCEPT list still conflicts with a non-empty one)
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_schema_except_conflict2
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s1),
+                  pub_test EXCEPT (TABLE pub_test.testpub_tbl_s2),
+                  pub_test;
+
 -- ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA on a table excluded by a schema publication:
 -- the schema-scoped exclusion is no longer meaningful once the table moves
 -- out of its schema, so the exclusion is auto-removed.
@@ -1298,6 +1318,30 @@ CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_except FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXC
 RESET client_min_messages;
 \dRp+ testpub_cursch_except
 DROP PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_except;
+
+-- CURRENT_SCHEMA and a named schema that resolve to the same OID must be
+-- treated as the same schema for EXCEPT-list consistency checking, just
+-- like two mentions of the same schema name
+-- fail: CURRENT_SCHEMA and pub_test1 (same schema) have conflicting EXCEPT lists
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_named_conflict
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl),
+                  pub_test1 EXCEPT (TABLE tbl1);
+
+-- succeeds: CURRENT_SCHEMA and pub_test1 (same schema) share the same EXCEPT list
+SET client_min_messages = 'ERROR';
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_named_same
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl),
+                  pub_test1 EXCEPT (TABLE tbl);
+RESET client_min_messages;
+\dRp+ testpub_cursch_named_same
+DROP PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_named_same;
+
+-- fail: two CURRENT_SCHEMA mentions (both resolving to pub_test1) with
+-- conflicting EXCEPT lists
+CREATE PUBLICATION testpub_cursch_cursch_conflict
+    FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl),
+                  CURRENT_SCHEMA EXCEPT (TABLE tbl1);
+
 RESET search_path;
 
 -- cleanup pub_test1 schema for invalidation tests
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)