v24-0001-table_scan_bitmap_next_block-implementations-cou.patch
application/octet-stream
Filename: v24-0001-table_scan_bitmap_next_block-implementations-cou.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Part: 0
Patch
Format: format-patch
Series: patch v24-0001
Subject: table_scan_bitmap_next_block implementations count lossy and exact pages
| File | + | − |
|---|---|---|
| src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c | 7 | 1 |
| src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c | 2 | 10 |
| src/include/access/tableam.h | 18 | 5 |
From df2655612a0a32d33fa144f3e48d0a2c63505e62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 08:51:40 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v24 01/12] table_scan_bitmap_next_block implementations count
lossy and exact pages
Keep track of whether or not individual TBMIterateResult's blocks were
represented lossily in the bitmap in table AM-specific code. These
counters are used for EXPLAIN.
This is a step toward removing TBMIterateResults as a flow control
mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), which is required for a more asynchronous
design. It also is more table AM-agnostic.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
---
src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c | 8 +++++++-
src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c | 12 ++----------
src/include/access/tableam.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
index 1c6da286d4..0ab3526d95 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
@@ -2116,7 +2116,8 @@ heapam_estimate_rel_size(Relation rel, int32 *attr_widths,
static bool
heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
- TBMIterateResult *tbmres)
+ TBMIterateResult *tbmres,
+ uint64 *lossy_pages, uint64 *exact_pages)
{
HeapScanDesc hscan = (HeapScanDesc) scan;
BlockNumber block = tbmres->blockno;
@@ -2244,6 +2245,11 @@ heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
Assert(ntup <= MaxHeapTuplesPerPage);
hscan->rs_ntuples = ntup;
+ if (tbmres->ntuples >= 0)
+ (*exact_pages)++;
+ else
+ (*lossy_pages)++;
+
return ntup > 0;
}
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
index 3c63bdd93d..988fac261e 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
@@ -212,8 +212,6 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
for (;;)
{
- bool valid_block;
-
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
/*
@@ -233,14 +231,8 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator(node, tbmres->blockno);
- valid_block = table_scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, tbmres);
-
- if (tbmres->ntuples >= 0)
- node->stats.exact_pages++;
- else
- node->stats.lossy_pages++;
-
- if (!valid_block)
+ if (!table_scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, tbmres,
+ &node->stats.lossy_pages, &node->stats.exact_pages))
{
/* AM doesn't think this block is valid, skip */
continue;
diff --git a/src/include/access/tableam.h b/src/include/access/tableam.h
index da661289c1..f87688c480 100644
--- a/src/include/access/tableam.h
+++ b/src/include/access/tableam.h
@@ -796,6 +796,10 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
* on the page have to be returned, otherwise the tuples at offsets in
* `tbmres->offsets` need to be returned.
*
+ * `lossy_pages` and `exact_pages` are EXPLAIN counters that can be
+ * incremented by the table AM to indicate whether or not the block's
+ * representation in the bitmap is lossy.
+ *
* XXX: Currently this may only be implemented if the AM uses md.c as its
* storage manager, and uses ItemPointer->ip_blkid in a manner that maps
* blockids directly to the underlying storage. nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
@@ -811,7 +815,8 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
* scan_bitmap_next_tuple need to exist, or neither.
*/
bool (*scan_bitmap_next_block) (TableScanDesc scan,
- struct TBMIterateResult *tbmres);
+ struct TBMIterateResult *tbmres,
+ uint64 *lossy_pages, uint64 *exact_pages);
/*
* Fetch the next tuple of a bitmap table scan into `slot` and return true
@@ -1949,17 +1954,23 @@ table_relation_estimate_size(Relation rel, int32 *attr_widths,
*/
/*
- * Prepare to fetch / check / return tuples from `tbmres->blockno` as part of
- * a bitmap table scan. `scan` needs to have been started via
+ * Prepare to fetch / check / return tuples from `tbmres->blockno` as part of a
+ * bitmap table scan. `scan` needs to have been started via
* table_beginscan_bm(). Returns false if there are no tuples to be found on
* the page, true otherwise.
*
+ * `lossy_pages` and `exact_pages` are EXPLAIN counters that can be incremented
+ * by the table AM to indicate whether or not the block's representation in the
+ * bitmap is lossy.
+ *
* Note, this is an optionally implemented function, therefore should only be
* used after verifying the presence (at plan time or such).
*/
static inline bool
table_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
- struct TBMIterateResult *tbmres)
+ struct TBMIterateResult *tbmres,
+ uint64 *lossy_pages,
+ uint64 *exact_pages)
{
/*
* We don't expect direct calls to table_scan_bitmap_next_block with valid
@@ -1970,7 +1981,9 @@ table_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_scan_bitmap_next_block call during logical decoding");
return scan->rs_rd->rd_tableam->scan_bitmap_next_block(scan,
- tbmres);
+ tbmres,
+ lossy_pages,
+ exact_pages);
}
/*
--
2.45.2